Liz Truss, new UK Prime Minister – bad for animal welfare, bad for the environment; and bad for the Conservative Party.
Liz Truss had won the party members election this Monday lunchtime, with the Oxford-born politician amassing 81,326 votes in her victory over rival Rishi Sunak, whose 60,399 votes were not enough to award him the title from the opinion-dividing Boris Johnson.
She won / was elected with just 57% of the Conservative Party vote. This means that a lot of people – party members, and a general population who were not even allowed to vote, did not give her support.
5/9/22. We are not politically biased to any party fortunately – and generally regard all of them as pretty useless when it comes to positive animal welfare issues which we have always said IS a big vote winner with the British public..
Today, the new Prime Minster of the UK has been announced; it is Liz Truss. There were 2 contenders for the position – Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss.
Liz Truss has refused to enshrine animal welfare in trade deals, says minister
George Eustice says rival Rishi Sunak has made clear there will be no compromise on welfare standards
Brexit trade deals, the environment secretary has said.
George Eustice was speaking at the Conservative Environment Network Tory leadership hustings on behalf of Rishi Sunak, and said he faced “challenges” in trying to get Truss to enshrine animal welfare in trade deals.
He said: “He’s (Shunak) got a position that I am much more comfortable with than I suspect will be the position with Liz Truss, and that is the position on international trade: he has made it clear that we shouldn’t compromise on animal welfare standards.
“It is fair to say there were some challenges I had in getting Liz Truss to recognise the importance of animal welfare in particular and that we should reflect it in trade agreements.”
An article from friend Phil (CEO at CIWF) re Liz Truss:
I may add more to this later
Update / additional:
In response to our concerns about FTA with Australia; for which I had many concerns regarding animal welfare, the UK Department for International Trade responded to myself in a letter dated 22/6/22. You can read a full copy of it in the following link as I published in a post shortly afterwards:
Page 2 of the letter declares that “the Government is committed to ensuring that any deal we sign includes protections for the agriculture industry”. It also states that “we have secured ground breaking provisions on animal welfare”.
WAV – This may be the case with Australia; and we are not in a position to declare either way; but with Liz Truss as the new UK PM, she has refused to enshrine animal welfare in trade deals, says minister (George Eustace).
So what are we to believe?
The Guardian (press) from London report:
“Liz Truss has refused to recognise the importance of animal welfare in post-Brexit trade deals, the environment secretary has said.
George Eustice was speaking at the Conservative Environment Network Tory leadership hustings on behalf of Rishi Sunak, and said he faced “challenges” in trying to get Truss to enshrine animal welfare in trade deals”.
Remember the words from department for international trade – “the Government is committed to ensuring that any deal we sign includes protections for the agriculture industry”. It also states that “we have secured ground breaking provisions on animal welfare”.
Liz Truss appears to be refusing and recognise the importance of animal welfare in post Brexit trade deals. The department for international trade say other things; Truss is the now the newly elected Prime Minister; so who we ask, with Conservatives, who is right, and who is wrong ???
If anyone out there can provide me with a sensible response as to who is right or wrong, then please mail it to me through the contact route on the site. I am confused, as I am sure many of you are. A ping pong approach; first one way then moving to another appears to me to be the current government policy on animal welfare and FTA’s – put simply; nobody knows what the hell is going on or what will happen in future.
One thing we can say for sure is that Liz Truss is not welcome by WAV in the PM position; there is only one person who she cares about, and that is a woman named Liz Truss. As for animal welfare in future FTA’s, I get the impression that despite years of presenting evidence and valid arguments against current systems; we can all go and screw ourselves now.
The next General Election in a few years will be a time when many people can then tell the government to go screw itself; we will keep on the pressure until then, and who knows, we may even get a one direction policy response to this current farce.
Regards (confused) Mark
Ben Goldsmith, the chair of the Conservative Environment Network, and a longtime green Tory who was a strong supporter of Boris Johnson, said of the UK’s new prime minister and her defeated rival: “Neither Truss nor Sunak has been known for their passion for nature. Neither has made a name for themselves as an environmental leader.”
Many green campaigners remember Truss as secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs from 2014 to 2016. Privately, they say she made little impact, other than to agree to cuts to the department’s budget that further reduced enforcement of environmental regulation, including of sewage polluting the UK’s waterways.