





A new petition to the Chinese Ambassador of France has been created!

Please stand with activists in France. Sign and share the petition.
Petition Letter:
We implore you Mr. Lu Shaye – Ambassador of China to France
To use your power so that the Chinese state takes immediate measures to protect the animals in this said territory! We demand the implementation of a law against acts of animal cruelty! The arrest and punishment of these individuals who commit these acts of extreme cruelty! Because of your status, you are able to influence these decisions.
Be aware that many people are outraged that such acts can continue. Do you want the country you represent to be known as a hell of a place for animals?
Due to the inertia of the Chinese government, an extremely dangerous and disturbing online community has spread. Its members inflict horrific acts on cats: Put in blenders as well as microwaves or ovens, slowly grill on the fire, cut parts of the body, soaked in chemicals to let them dissolve alive, remove skin, scratch and gouge out eyes, crushed with hammers, submerged in boiling water, hung by the neck and ears, perforated with iron bars, teeth and nails torn out.
The latter, we will never cease to recall, are living beings acquired from a sentience just like you, and experiencing a physical pain, in no way less than we could feel. Their torture session is filmed, and broadcast online on global platforms, such as Telegram or Twitter, so these extremely dangerous individuals can lead young minds down the path of evil. The future of our humanity is very worrisome if we do nothing.
We remind you of Gandhi’s words, “The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way animals are treated in it”, therefore China is at the lowest level of civilization. This is an ethical issue in which the true character of our souls will be revealed.
We, the undersigned, call on Ambassador Lu Shaye of China and all relevant authorities to take severe measures to put an end to this network of torture as a matter of urgency.
FOR ACTION FIND LINK IN BIO
@feline_guardians

The Killer On My Doorstep; Down The Road; Across The River; Anywhere !! – World Animals Voice
China: ‘Crush’ Information. – World Animals Voice
EXPOSING AND COMBATING CAT TORTURE NETWORKS. 6/1/24. – World Animals Voice
China: Cat Torture Actions Follow Up – No. 1 – World Animals Voice
China – Cat Torture – Major Information and Actions – Follow Up No. 2 – World Animals Voice


1 March 2024
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the explicit recognition of animal welfare in the scope of the financial aid and calls on the EU to ensure that the Facility will indeed foster improved animal welfare standards in all grants and loans given to the Ukrainian beneficiaries.
On 27 February the European Parliament approved the revision of the EU’s long term budget, which includes the so-called Ukraine Facility mechanism. The Facility mechanism – powered with 50 billion EUR – will be the EU’s main instrument providing financial support to Ukraine until 2027. Importantly, animal welfare is recognised as an objective of the Facility mechanism.
Fostering investments in line with EU animal welfare standards is becoming critical in light of the unconditional and full trade liberalisation between the EU and Ukraine in place since 30 May 2022. This full liberalisation is for now further fuelling intensive animal agriculture in Ukraine with a significant increase of poultry meat and egg imports. Conditioning investments to animal welfare standards has the potential to improve the welfare of millions of animals in Ukraine, ensuring EU citizens’ wishes to protect animals are respected. This will also send the right message to EU producers to accelerate the transition to sustainable methods of production.
Prioritising animal welfare through the Facility will also ease Ukraine’s accession negotiations to the EU by stimulating a sustainable reconstruction of its agricultural system aiming at an alignment with the EU acquis. Ukraine is a big agricultural producer with a large share of it relating to animal products. Using the financial support of the Facility to help Ukraine transition towards more sustainable agricultural methods of production is the only way forward in order to advance Ukraine’s green recovery.
Regards Mark
WAV Comment – all very well deserved, but what about Joaquin ?
Joaquin Phoenix Pleads for Animal Rights in Academy Awards Speech – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
By Simran Jeet
Feb 29, 2024
In the world of Hollywood, where fame and fortune often take center stage, there exists a group of celebrities whose compassion extends beyond the red carpet to the animal kingdom. These stars utilize their platform and resources to advocate for animal rights, promote adoption, and support various conservation efforts. Here are five Hollywood animal lovers making a big difference.
Animal activism
Alicia Silverstone
Actor Alicia Silverstone, a committed vegan, earned recognition as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals PETA’s Sexiest Female Vegetarian in 2004.Beyond championing various animal charities like the African Wildlife Foundation, Animal Asia, and PETA, she authored The Kind Diet advocating for plant-based nutrition.Known for her activism against animal testing, she also rescues abandoned pets and animals, providing them with loving homes.
Animal conservation
Betty White
Betty White, an original Hollywood animal activist, passionately supported numerous charities including Farm Sanctuary and the Helen Woodward Animal Center. Adopting rescue animals and advocating for their rights, she served on the Los Angeles Zoo board for 50 years. White’s dedication extended to funding zoos for monkeys and gorillas, leaving a lasting legacy in animal welfare and conservation efforts.
Anti-fur campaign
Billie Eilish
Billie Eilish, a prominent figure among Gen Z, adopted a vegan lifestyle from childhood. She vocally opposes the use of animal products in both fashion and food industries. Notably, she persuaded fashion brand Oscar de la Renta to permanently cease using fur, earning recognition as PETA’s “Person of the Year.” Billie has also adopted rescued dogs and cats.
PETA
Bryan Adams
Pioneering a vegan lifestyle in the early 1990s, Bryan Adams has remained dedicated to his cause.His passion for animal welfare has led him to actively support campaigns such as PETA’s anti-fur movement and advocate for the Southern Antarctic Whale Sanctuary.Additionally, Bryan lends his voice to organizations like Greenpeace, Mercy For Animals, and The Gorilla Organization, vehemently opposing animal exploitation.
Leonardo DiCaprio
Leonardo DiCaprio, one of Hollywood’s wealthiest stars, channels his resources toward noble causes. Advocating for both animal rights and environmental conservation, he is notably associated with the documentary “Cowspiracy” and has endorsed other vegan films like Eating Our Way To Extinction (2022).DiCaprio’s philanthropy extends to various organizations, including the African Wildlife Foundation, WWF, and his own initiative, the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation.
Hollywood’s A-list animal advocates revealed (newsbytesapp.com)
Regards Mark
No Joaquin ? – you must be joking ! – or the Joker.

1st March – It currently looks bare, but will gradually show all our global visitors as the weeks of March progress.
https://clustrmaps.com/site/1a9kn





29 February 2024
Press Release
The modernised EU-Chile Free Trade Agreement, approved by the European Parliament today, includes commitments to animal welfare such as the recognition of animal sentience, the phase-out of antibiotics used as growth promoters, and language on animal welfare cooperation.
While these provisions are welcomed, the negative impacts of unconditional trade liberalisation should not be ignored: The EU and Chile should maximise the language on animal welfare cooperation within the agreement to ensure significant progress for the well-being of animals.
In 2002, when the EU and Chile concluded their first trade agreement, they added, for the first time ever, provisions on animal welfare cooperation. Yet, it was followed by increased intensification in the Chilean livestock and aquaculture sectors due to increased trade opportunities. There is a high risk that this modernised deal will fuel this trend as it grants further market access for Chilean animal products by increasing quotas for poultry, pork, sheep and beef without any animal welfare condition. Such a condition could have contributed to enhancing animal welfare standards in Chile, especially considering that Chilean producers believe that the trade deal would generate greater certainty for investments aimed at exports to the EU.
The FTA does include a chapter on sustainable food systems with provisions on animal welfare cooperation, despite being non-commital. Future EU-Chile cooperation on animal welfare, as like-minded partners, must focus on concrete initiatives such as the phase-out of cages for pigs and poultry, along with lower stocking densities for poultry. Other areas include animal transport, the use of anaesthesia for mutilations and joint action plans to phase out antibiotic use in animal production.
It is disappointing that the new EU approach to Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters will not yet apply to this trade agreement. The review process of the TSD Chapter should contain detailed language on the link between animal welfare and sustainable development, wildlife conservation and trafficking, and the importance of ensuring aquaculture welfare. In terms of enforcement, the EU and Chile should create clear roadmaps, identify priority issues, and include last-resort sanctions.
In November 2021, Chilean President Gabriel Boric signed an Animalist Commitment with Veg Foundation during his campaign. The document includes 10 points to improve the lives of animals raised for consumption.
Unfortunately after two years of government, very little progress has been made in fulfilling this commitment, since only one of the 10 points has been worked on. We call on President Boric to keep his word and improve the lives of millions of animals in Chile, by implementing these points in both trade agreements and national law. This FTA could have bolstered national efforts similar to the impact of the first EU-Chile trade agreement, which led to the adoption of Chilean animal welfare law in 2009
Ignacia Uribe, Founder and CEO, Veg Foundation.
Until the EU has animal welfare-based import requirements, the EU should negotiate ambitious animal welfare conditions with all trading partners, and replicate the approach it followed in the EU-New Zealand trade agreement. The EU should not let its trade agenda freeze the path toward higher welfare food systems. Embracing animal welfare conditions in some FTAs while omitting them in others would certainly be incoherent,
Reineke Hameleers, CEO, Eurogroup for Animals.
Eurogroup for Animals and the Chilean-based organisation Veg Foundation regret that the modernisation of this trade agreement fails to guarantee that EU-Chile trade does not have a detrimental impact on animals, and encourage the effective transition towards sustainable food systems in which animals’ well-being is promoted and respected.
Regards Mark

Survey shows EU consumers want better animal welfare laws
28 February 2024
Almost 9/10 consumers responded that they support better animal welfare laws for animals raised for consumption, and believe that the EU should act to update legislation to offer them protection.

In a new survey by BEUC, which aimed to analyse consumer’s attitudes on animal welfare, 6/10 consumers said that they have a low level of knowledge on animal welfare practices and 3/4r want a better labelling system for animal-derived products. Consumers expressed that they have a low trust in animal welfare claims by companies and 84% would react negatively to welfare-washing.
7/10 respondents expressed the need for the cost of transition to be equitably shared, and that the EU must provide funds to farmers to implement higher standards.
A large majority, 78%, agreed that imports of animal products should be subject to the same welfare rules as those produced in the EU. This has been supported by another report by Vrije Universiteit Brussel and BEUC, which concluded that EU trade policy is not sufficiently coherent with the Green Deal, and consumers must be treated fairly through import requirements, and through better labelling that allows them to make an informed choice.

With 9 in 10 consumers supporting new laws for better animal welfare, our survey confirms that the way we treat animals raised for food matters to people. It is high time the EU Commission delivered on its promises to revise EU laws on farm animal welfare
Monique Goyens, Director General, BEUC.
This survey spans Belgium, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. 1,000 respondents per country were surveyed in November 2023.

WAV Comment – EU citizens are not the ignorant ones; it is those in the Commission who fail to take note !
Regards Mark

Animal rights groups get rare authorization for private prosecution in live-horse export case
Story by Karen Pauls

Kaitlyn Mitchell is director of legal advocacy with Animal Justice, a non-profit that wants a ban on the horse meat industry. (Travis Golby/CBC)© Provided by cbc.ca
In what’s believed to be a first in relation to farmed animals, a court has given animal welfare advocates the green light to privately prosecute a live-horse exporter in Manitoba.
“We have so few laws on the books to protect these horses,” said Kaitlyn Mitchell, director of legal advocacy with the non-profit group Animal Justice.
“The least that we can do is to make sure that what few laws we do have are actually enforced. Otherwise, what good are they?”
The case involves an air shipment of live horses in December 2022 from Winnipeg to Japan. The Korean Air cargo plane was supposed to stop in Anchorage, Alaska, for refueling and a crew change, but there was a blizzard, so they had to find an alternate route.
That, combined with delays in Winnipeg, meant the shipment exceeded the 28-hour maximum time live horses can be transported without food, water and rest.
Several organizations — Animal Justice, the Winnipeg Humane Society, the Canadian Horse Defence Coalition and Manitoba Animal Save — filed a complaint with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which acknowledged the breach and confirmed three horses had fallen during the transport, but said there would be no penalty.
“We urged them [CFIA] to take enforcement action, and we were incredibly disappointed when they didn’t,” Mitchell said.
“Once we realized that the CFIA was not going to take action, then we made the decision to commence this private prosecution.”
The group argued three different laws were violated and proposed three separate charges.
After a hearing in Winnipeg Tuesday, a Manitoba provincial court judge allowed a charge to be laid against Carolyle Farms — a live-horse exporter located in Swan River, Man. — under a section of Canada’s Health of Animals Regulations, which require a contingency plan to respond to unforeseen delays that could result in the suffering of an animal.
But the Crown stayed a proposed charge under the regulations for exceeding the maximum time limit for a transport, because it said the CFIA was part of those discussions. It also stayed a proposed charge for causing distress to animals, citing jurisdictional concerns.
“Where did these horses collapse? Was it somewhere over the ocean? We just don’t know. So that’s frustrating,” Mitchell said, adding the case is a rare example of a private prosecution — in which a private individual, rather than public authorities, is permitted by the court to lay a charge for an alleged offence.
“I vividly recall that cold winter night one year ago,” said Manitoba Animal Save organizer Danae Tonge, who documented the 2022 shipment.
“I am relieved that the court allowed this charge to be laid and look forward to the next steps in this case.”
Farm owner defends decision
Lyle Lumax, the owner of Carolyle Farms, said Tuesday that a phone call from CBC News was the first he’d heard of the court action.
He defended the decision to carry on with the December 2022 flight, even though it would exceed the legal time limit.
Lumax, who says he understands and loves horses, said the contingency plan is always to bring the horses back to the farm, but that 10-hour round trip puts even more strain on them.
“I can’t exactly remember, but it was something like we were three hours over the 28 hours,” he said.
“And everybody involved decided that was far less risky to the horses then putting them back on the trucks, driving back to the farm, loading them and putting them back into the plane and into the crates again.”
CBC has also asked the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for comment.
Canada is among the leading exporters of live horses, mostly Clydesdales and Percherons, bred specifically for human consumption — an industry worth tens of millions of dollars a year.
Raw horse meat sushi is considered a delicacy in Japan. The horses exported sell for up to $9,000 each, Lumax said. The horses are fattened up in Japan before being slaughtered, according to the CFIA.
Mitchell estimates nearly 4,000 horses have been exported from Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg in the last year.
In a 2021 mandate letter, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told his agriculture minister to work toward ending exports of live horses for slaughter. Advocates and activists have circulated petitions and put pressure on the federal Liberals to follow through.
A private member’s bill before Parliament now would prohibits exporting live horses from Canada by air for slaughter.
Mitchell said she will testify before an agricultural committee in Ottawa on Thursday.
Regards Mark

The National Council for the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty for Animals (NSPCA) has called for a complete ban of livestock exports via sea following the discovery of the abhorrent condition in which animals were kept on the Al Kuwait, which docked in Cape Town last week to load feed on its way from Brazil to Iraq.

Cattle on board the Al Kuwait ship, which docked in Cape Town last week.
Photo: The National Council of SPCA
According to the NSPCA, the stench that came from the ship and raised concerns from members of the public was indicative of the awful conditions the animals, which had been on the sea for two-and-a half weeks up until then, had to endure due to a build-up of faeces and ammonia.
The NSPCA discovered diseased, injured and dead cattle among the 19 000 cattle aboard, and had to euthanise eight cows because of their poor condition. Treatment was given to the other animals to prevent further mortalities.
The NSPCA stated that the incident served as a stark reminder that the live export of animals by sea was a gruesome and outdated practice and underscored the urgent need for legislative reform and heightened global awareness to end this cruelty.
The Red Meat Producers Organisation of South Africa (RPO) clarified in a statement that the ship belonged to the international company Al Mawashi and that the current situation had nothing to do with the South African industry or Al Mawashi South Africa, which arranges and coordinates South African exports.
The NSPCA since 2019 had been in and out of court fighting for a live sheep export ban from South Africa, but it lost its case against Al Mawashi South Africa in 2021, with the exports allowed to continue subject to certain conditions.
Dr Frikkie Maré, CEO of the RPO, told Farmer’s Weekly that the RPO was concerned about the welfare of the animals on the ship, and recognised the rights of animals as noted in the Constitution of South Africa: “As primary producers, our animals are our pride. It grieves us to see animals receive poor treatment.”
Maré said that the industry was concerned about the possible influence the situation might have on the biosecurity of South Africa, with people moving on and off the ship and the possibility of dead animals being offloaded, especially because the Western Cape does not really have the capacity to handle livestock.
“As a country that is already struggling to regain its animal health status from the World Organisation for Animal Health, we cannot afford more breaches of our biosecurity.”
With the renewed call for a complete ban of live animal exports via sea, Maré pointed out that South Africa needed this alternative market to grow the industry, which in turn would contribute to rural development, poverty alleviation and job creation.
“We export both live animals and carcasses. We cannot move away from live animal exports as this is what the import markets desire, usually for religious reasons.”
He pointed out that government in collaboration with the industry had drawn up a protocol for live exports, with more than 300 inputs by industry taken up in the protocol to ensure that exports were done responsibly. Work is currently underway to turn the protocol into legislation.
Since the only livestock export harbour in South Africa is in East London, the Eastern Cape RPO has established a livestock export forum, which together with the SPCA and other institutions, ensures that exports from South Africa take place according to this protocol.
He added that live exports from South Africa by ship had a good record, with mortalities on board being lower than mortalities in domestic feedlots.
Dr Ivan Meyer, the Western Cape Minister of Agriculture, in response to the incident made submissions to the ad hoc Committee on the Powers Bill in the Western Cape Provincial Parliament for the inclusion of veterinary services in the bill.
He explained that the Western Cape Powers Bill called for the Western Cape Government to gain greater control over the management of the port and trade.
If approved, the Western Cape Powers Bill will allow the Western Cape Government to intervene in similar situations and safeguard animal and public health, defend animal welfare and advance biosecurity.
In the interim, he said, the department would continue to support the relevant authorities in addressing concerns related to veterinary care, public health, and biosecurity.
Regards Mark


Source Tracy Murphy via IDA
Thanks to Stacey as always – Mark
Please Oppose Prosecution of Activist (vs prosecution of neglectful farmer) Who Rescued Cows
Please click HERE to sign petition
Source In Defense of Animals
Asha’s Farm Sanctuary owner Tracy Murphy has a big heart for animals. When two cows wandered into her sanctuary, she provided them with a safe haven. Now she’s being charged for caring for the escaped cattle she named Ismael and Little Willow. Tell the district attorney to drop the charges against Tracy for having compassion for all animals, including those who usually are eaten by humans!
As founder and president of Asha’s Farm Sanctuary in upstate New York, Tracy was merely doing her job by rescuing two cows who wandered onto the sanctuary, which is a refuge for abused cattle, pigs, and chickens. She cared for the cows and immediately reported them to the Society for the Prevention and Cruelty to Animals in July 2022.
Tracy, acting on the advice of her attorney at the time, refused to hand over Ismael and Little Willow without proof of ownership. After another week, the police executed a search warrant and arrested Tracy. Sadly, authorities seized Ismael and Little Willow, and returned them to the purported “owner,” probably for slaughter.
Since her arrest, Tracy has faced significant financial and emotional hardships, along with facing one count of grand larceny and up to seven years in prison. Tracy was publicly humiliated when she was forced to wear shackles in court and suffered ostracization, harassment, and threats throughout this case.
Fortunately, the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project at the Sturm College of Law is defending Tracy. With its assistance, a superior court lifted the gag order placed on Tracy and two town justices have recused themselves from this case.
This summer, Tracy will go to trial for her compassionate actions. Her next court hearing is scheduled in the Town of Wheatfield for March 5. Help us urge Niagara County District Attorney Brian Seaman to dismiss the charges against Tracy to free her from the shackles of injustice and ensure the lives of Ismael and Little Willow were not taken in vain.
Other actions:
1. Make a polite call. Please call and leave a courteous message for Niagara County District Attorney Brian Seaman who has the power to end this legal nightmare and permit Tracy Murphy to continue her noble work for animals.
Dial (716) 439-7085 and leave a message for Brian Seaman.
You can say, “Asha’s Farm Sanctuary Founder and President Tracy Murphy was simply doing her job when she rescued two cows who wandered onto her sanctuary. She should be rewarded for her kindness and compassion, not punished. Please dismiss the charges against Tracy.”
2. Go Vegan. If you love animals and want to save cows like Ismael and Little Willow, try vegan meals today! Download our veg guide for fast and easy recipes.
3. Post on Social Media. Show your support for Tracy Murphy on the Niagara County Facebook page and Instagram.
You can say, “Don’t convict Tracy Murphy for compassion for cows. She’s just doing her job. Sanctuary owners rescue animals. Please drop the charges against Tracy Murphy!”
I wonder why, when nonvegans and antivegans proclaim they “care” about animals, do they then malign, harass, and prosecute vegans who SAVE ANIMALS?
Why was the NEGLECTFUL FARMER whose harmful actions leading to Ismael and Little Willow just wandering away, NOT prosecuted?
Why do I have to write prosecutors almost EACH DAY to prosecute violent crimes against ANIMALS?
I’ll tell you why: because as long as vegans can be characterized as criminals/stupid/cultish/malnourished/blahblahblah/etcetcetc, non/antivegans can, somehow, comfortably ignore us and continue violently abusing and killing animals (yes, even if you personally don’t slaughter the animals you consume, you are still responsible for the violence and harm perpetrated against them). And prosecuting violent crimes against animals is an uncomfortable slippery slope for many nonvegans: if harming a cat is considered animal cruelty, why doesn’t the law consider harming a chicken animal cruelty? Like human animals, they both experience pain, fear, and suffering.
And seriously? Shackles? Was it so terrifying being in the same room with a NONVIOLENT VEGAN who SAVES and RESCUES? Or was it to humiliate her? The mocking of injustice, and the representation of the judicial system with juvenile and bullying theatrics, is embarrassing and cruel. But people would rather immaturely deflect from the violent suffering of the most defenseless and vulnerable beings by ridiculing the humans who reject such injustice because otherwise the nonvegans would have to acknowledge their participation in the unrelenting, incalculable suffering of animals.
You indifferently dismiss the victims because you personally enjoy stealing from their bodies, and then you mock the humans who oppose animal suffering.
The most dangerous humans include those whose indifference towards animal suffering fuels their indifference towards human suffering.
This injustice is disturbing and disgusting and, quite frankly, criminal. You just enjoy a status quo of normalized violence towards animals and normalized, acceptable hatred and intolerance towards vegans.
And do remember: regardless of how humans define the suffering of animals in terms that provides humans comfort causing the suffering of animals (humane, welfare …) animals are required to suffer, their violent, cruel, unwilling deaths are inherent as are their brief existences of required pain, control, and separation of family.
FYI, again:
I’m going to link a couple previous articles here that establish the suffering animals are required to endure in each “phase” of “animal agriculture” as documented via recent exposes and, predominately, industry data from the USDA; I’m sharing them again here due to the fact that “anag” is responsible for the incalculable suffering of TRILLIONS of animals violently killed each year for “food”, either directly consumed, or during the “process”, such as those killed for AI or those who are killed as infants outside a slaughterhouse.
You don’t kill and consume animals because you honestly believe that NOT killing and NOT consuming animals is INhumane or UNethical, correct?
Why cause animal suffering that you can easily NOT?
One of These Things Is Not Like the Other
SL
Download Your free Vegan PDF HERE
Order a free vegan kit HERE
Dairy-Free Info HERE
Take the Dairy-Free Challenge HERE
Click HERE for more Dairy-Free
Fish alternatives can be found HERE
Learn about eggs HERE
Find bacon alternatives HERE and HERE
Take PETA’s Cruelty-Free Shopping Guide along with you next time you head to the store! The handy guide will help you find humane products at a glance. Order a FREE copy HERE
Searching for Cruelty-Free Cosmetics, Personal-Care Products, Vegan Products, or more?
Click HERE to search.
Free PDF of Vegan & Cruelty-Free Products/Companies HERE
Click HERE for clothing without suffering
Click below for nominal, or no, fees to vegan literature that you can use to convince others that veganism is the only humane:
PETA HERE
Vegan Outreach HERE
Get free Anti-Speciesism Activist Kit material from PETA HERE
Click HERE for Well-Fed World’s Free Climate Food Guide PDF