Month: July 2023

EU: European Parliament to vote on two major climate and nature laws this July.

European Parliament to vote on two major climate and nature laws this July

9 July 2023

Two plenary votes are coming up at the European Parliament that could have a huge impact on the planet; one on the Industrial Emissions Directive and the other on the Nature Restoration Law. It’s critical that policymakers vote in favour of nature, as well as for an ambitious threshold for animal agriculture, so that we can get to work on the urgent task of mitigating our impact on the climate and natural landscapes.

Find out below why these laws are so important, what impact these two plenary votes could have and what we, along with some of our members, have to say about them. 

What is the Industrial Emissions Directive?

The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) has been designed to stop and/or control industrial emissions. 

Adopted in 2010, it’s currently the main policy in Europe to regulate pollutant emissions from industry, including from air pollution and wastewater discharge. 

In 2022, the Commission adopted proposals to make the IED stronger by including emissions from large cattle farms within its scope, in addition to the large pig and poultry farms that were already covered.

Any installation controlled by the IED is forced to reduce emissions, and needs a permit to operate. The original Commission proposal suggested including more industrial-size animal farms, with a threshold of 150 or more livestock units (LSU). 150 LSU corresponds to, as examples, a large farm with 500 pigs, 150 dairy cows, 10,700 laying hens or 21,400 broiler chickens. 

The goal of this revision was to bring the Directive more closely in-line with the goals set out in the European Green Deal, and other relevant policies. The debate around it has also put the intensification of EU animal farming in the spotlight

On July 10, the European Parliament will vote on the Commission’s proposal. If they vote in favour of it, amazing steps could be taken to reduce our industrial emissions – especially from agriculture.

If they vote against it, however, these systems will continue to cause great damage to nature and the climate – which they’re already doing at an alarming rate.

What is the Nature Restoration Law?

Last year, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a Nature Restoration Law, which focuses on how we can recover and protect our ecosystems. Among its targets, the proposal aims to restore at least 20% of the EU’s land and sea areas by 2030 and all ecosystems in need by 2050. 

There are plenty of positive examples of where nature restoration strategies have been successful. Deploying these kinds of strategies at EU level, then, would have sweeping impacts on biodiversity, land and marine ecosystems, the health of our soils (which is critical for food security) and more. As with the Industrial Emissions Directive, it’s extremely important that policymakers acknowledge the necessity of this move and vote in its favour.

What are the stakes?

The 2020 State of Nature in the EU report states that only 14% of habitats and only 27% of non-bird species currently have good conservation status. Moreover, the 2021 assessment for the EU Red List of Birds showed that 1 out of 3 bird species declined over the last few decades. These numbers demonstrate that, beyond species’ populations, wild animal individuals in the EU are suffering from a decline in the quality of their habitats. Habitat loss is a major source of stress for wild animals, restraining their movements and threatening their access to food, water and shelter.

These issues clearly can’t be allowed to develop any further. Only action at EU level will help us to mitigate our impacts on the climate and environment in a meaningful way. That’s why we’re working with our members to call on the European Parliament to address these plenary votes with the seriousness they deserve. 

It’s time for our policies to meet our planet’s needs!

We’re looking to the European Parliament to redefine ‘climate change’ -by changing the course of the climate crisis, instead of letting it continue – and using their power for the planet’s good. 

Farming should look far different by 2050. 

Regards Mark

EU: European scientists continue to support an EU roadmap to accelerate the transition to non-animal science.

European scientists continue to support an EU roadmap to accelerate the transition to non-animal science

10 July 2023

In the space of a week, 80 European scientists from 14 EU countries have signed an open letter calling on the European Commission and Member States to commit to establishing an EU roadmap to accelerate the transition to non-animal science.

The transition to non-animal science can offer more effective and accurate humane solutions for biomedical research and regulatory testing, and has been acknowledged by the European CommissionEU agencies, the cosmeticschemicalpharmaceutical and healthcare industries, the consumer goods sector, and academia as an important step in tackling the health and environmental issues that threaten society today. This transition is overwhelmingly supported by Members of the European Parliament and EU citizens, and is in line with the European Union’s objective to fully replace the use of animals in science.

To achieve improved human health and environmental protection, it is essential to coordinate EU efforts and policies that facilitate and prioritise the transition to non-animal science in all EU research, innovation and education initiatives. Clear short-, medium-, and long-term actions are needed to guide and accelerate the adoption of innovative non-animal approaches while phasing-out animal-based methods. In addition, a coordinated European Research Area (ERA) initiative can revolutionise the scientific landscape by supporting innovation, research infrastructure, and knowledge sharing to train and inspire scientists, educators, students and regulators in the use of non-animal approaches.

The undersigned call on the European Commission and the Member States to establish an EU roadmap and launch an ERA action. This initiative should include concrete milestones, cross-sector support, open science principles, dedicated funding and harmonised education and training initiatives to accelerate the transition to non-animal research, regulatory testing and education.

If you are an EU academic or scientist and wish to sign this open letter, please follow this link.

List of signatories: 

Name:Position:Affiliation:Country:Suggestions:
Martin PaparellaSenior ResearcherMedical University InnsbruckAustria 
Bernard GODELLEUniversity professorUniversity of MontpellierFrance 
Penny NymarkAssistant ProfessorKarolinska InstitutetSwedenIn parallel with development of non-animal methods, known as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) within chemical risk assessment, it is also paramount that all generated data in science is made Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR)! Besides being a non-animal method in itself, reuse of data is the only way we can move into an era of machine-driven and AI-supported predictive chemical risk assessment without the reliance on animal testing.
Pranjul ShahHead of the IncubatorUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg 
Mario RothbauerGroup LeaderMedical University of Vienna – Dpt. Ortho Trauma SurgeryAustria 
Dania MoviaAssistant ProfessorTrinity College DublinRepublic of Ireland 
Prof. Dr. Stefan DübelHead, Dept. of BiotechnologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigGermany 
Ashwani SharmaCo-founderInsight BiosolutionsFranceHello, I agree that we need alternative methods than animal testing as using like human in vitro models can give better results than animal testing.
Janneke Hogervorst, PhDPostdoctoral researcherHasselt UniversityBelgiumFor many areas of research, animal testing is known to have very limited validity. We don’t need to first develop non-animal methods there; we should just end animal experiments there right now and spend our limited resources on other research. We need more systematic reviews into the validity of animal experiments, rather than treat animal experiments as the gold standard that we need to find replacements for. Ending what doesn’t work is innovation too.
Love HansellPhD ResearcherRadboud UniversitySweden 
Bas van BalkomAsst ProfessorUMC UtrechtThe Netherlands 
Margherita ScarpaEngeneerInstitut Jacques MonodFrance 
Federica EmilianiLecturerInHolland University of Applied SciencesThe NetherlandsInvesting even more in in vitro/silico modelling
Birgit GoversenPostdoctoral researcherAmsterdam UMCThe Netherlands– More funds for the improvement of current NAMs
– A focus on understanding, supporting and convincing stakeholders; not on forcing them to use NAMs
Merel Ritskes-HoitingaProf. in Evidence-Based Transition to Animal-Free InnovationsUtrecht UniversityThe NetherlandsSetting goals is key, just like we do for the economy. The science and technology ARE here to move to non-animal science. By teaming up with social sciences and key stakeholders we can accelerate and strive towards ending animal testing by 2035.
Rosalinde MasereeuwFull professorUtrecht UniversityThe NetherlandsMake sure everybody is on-board, we can only make the transition together.
Mathieu VinkenONTOX coordinator/university professorVrije Universiteit BrusselBelgium 
Koen KramerResearcher animal ethicsWageningen University & ResearchThe Netherlands 
AC van VeenPostdocRadboud UniversityThe Netherlands 
Tuula HeinonenProfessorTampere UniversityFinlandRegulators give acceptance criteria for approving non-animal methods to predict safety (all chemicals) for all end points and efficacy (drugs)
Julia D ZajacProject managerVrije Universiteit BrusselBelgium 
Sonja von AulockEditor in chief, CEOALTEX – Alternatives to Animal ExperimentationGermany 
Tobias TheskaPhD StudentMax Planck Institute for Biology TübingenGermany 
Ingeborg Eva ReihsDoctoral candidateMedical University of ViennaAustriaMore specific funding for absolute animal-free and clean science, method establishment. Awards for absolute animal-free approaches and more critical thinking about so-called animal-free research.
Alicia PainiSenior ToxicologistesqLABS GmbHItaly 
Eliska Kuchovskapostdoctoral researcherIUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental MedicineGermany 
Marina Garcia de LomanaResearch ScientistBayer AGGermany 
Job BerkhoutPhD StudentUU, RIVMThe Netherlands 
Domenico GadaletaScientific ConsultantIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri – IRCCSItaly 
Katharina KochPostdoctoral ResearcherIUF – Leibniz-Research Institute for Environmental MedicineGermanyMore interaction between researchers, the regulatory bodies and the industry. ECHA for example! More case studies supported by the regulatory bodies and indurtry. More guidance on the use of PBTK in POD estimation.
Erwin L RoggenCEO and WP6 leader of the ONTOX project3Rs Management and Consulting ApSDenmarkWillingness to change and courage to embrace innovation in practice, not only words.
Ellen FritscheProfessorDNTOX GmbHGermanyEstablish case studies involving different stakeholders and compare classical risk assessment to NAM-based risk assessment.
Helena KandarovaESTIV President, Director of UEFT CEM SASESTIV and Slovak Academy of ScienceSlovakiaPlease try to harmonize legistlation accorst various sectors so that animal testing is not requested in areas, where replacements are availabe (e.g. medical devices, pesticides, pharmaceuticals)
Alessio GambaPostdoc researcherVPH institute and University of LiegeBelgium 
Jeffrey BajramovicDirector 3Rs Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands 
PD Dr.-Ing. Joachim WiestAdjunct professorTechnical University of MunichGermany 
Nicolas BayerMaster StudentRPTU KaiserslauternGermanyethically based funding!!!
Christiane SpruckPhD studentIUFGermany 
Florian CaimentAssociate ProfessorMaastricht UniversityThe Netherlands 
Andreas SchiwyPostDoc, TeamleaderGoethe UniversityGermanyThe advancement of chemical defined media for culture of cells, replacement of animal derived products like fetal bovine serum as well as rat liver S9 with biotechnological alternatives. The development of physiological media to sustain cell lines that show similar reaction compared to the human body.
Liliana Moreira TeixeiraAssistant professorUniversity of TwenteThe Netherlands 
busuqetceoaltertoxBelgium 
John GrinFull professor in the governance of transitionsUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands 
Huub SchellekensEmeritus ProfessorUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands 
Esther WenzelCOOAbcalis GmbHGermany 
Tamara VanhaeckeProfessorVrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Medicine & PharmacyBelgium 
Maria TsamouChief Scientific OfficerToxGenSolutionsThe Netherlands 
Emilio BenfenatiHead of DepartmentIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriItaly 
Wouter DhertProfessor and Scientific Director Innovation in Life SciencesUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands 
Daniela SalvatoriProfesssor Anatomy and Physiology, Chairperson Animal-free Innovation Utrecht UniversityUtrecht UniversityThe NetherlandsEducation (interprofessioanl education) and creation of a community able to go through the necessary changes
Hanna DuszaPostdoctoral researcherUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands 
Annalisa GastaldelloProject OfficerEuropean CommissionItaly 
KonstantinaPhD studentVU AmsterdamThe NetherlandsAllocating funds to research aimed at developing in vitro methods modeling animal testing.
Jakob (Jaap) HeringaProfessor BioinformaticsVrije Universiteit AmsterdamThe NetherlandsFAIR data infrastructure; Digital twin
Jos JooreCEOMimetasThe Netherlands 
Victoria MarinchevaAssist. Prof.University of Forestry SofiaBulgaria 
Iliyan ManevAssos. Prof. in ImmunologyFaculty of Veterinary medicine, University of ForestryBulgaria 
Eckhard von KeutzConsultantIndependentGermanyA concrete working plan which contains the deliverables and the associated timelines. Leadership and commitment are needed to execute on the roadmap.
Jiayi YangPhD candidateUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands 
Silvia ScaglioneChief Scientist, President of React4lifeReact4lifeItaly 
Kamile JovaisaiteScientific Sales RepresentativeSTEMCELL TechnologiesThe Netherlands 
Madalena CiprianoSenior ScientistUniversity of TübingenGermany 
Benoît MaisonneuveCSONETRIFrance4 steps are necessary IMO: 1 – funding to develop and validate NAMs with clinical data, 2 – access to the clinical data (usually confidential), 3 – a regulatory framework to develop NAMs, and of course 4 – a legislative evolution of the European regulation (concerning drug developement etc) similar to what has been done in the USA and in India.
Luiz LadeiraPostdoctoral researcherLiège UniversitéBelgium 
Erwin L RoggenCEOToxGenSolutions BVThe NetherlandsWiilingness and confidence based on scientific data in stead of believe.
Eva Bernet Kemperspostdoctoral researcherUniversity of AntwerpBelgium 
Line MathiesenAssociate ProfessorUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark 
Ellen FritscheProf.IUFGermany 
Costanza RovidaScientific OfficerCAAT-EuropeGermany 
Christian MaassPrincipal Scientist, Lead Digital Organ-on-Chip PlatformesqLABSGermanyCoordination with roadmap on standardization from CEN/CENELEC
Timea GandekPhd studentUniversity of GroningenThe Netherlands 
Ramiro JoverProfessorUniversity of ValenciaEspaña 
Kathrin HerrmannSenior AssociateJohns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT)Germany 
Rafael GozalbesCEOProtoQSAR SLSPAIN 
Arno GutlebManaging DirectorINVITROLIZE sarlLuxembourg 
Hubert DirvenDepartment Director Chemical toxicologyNorwegian Institute of Public HealthNorwayLegislation for chemicals need to be revised
Dr Brett A. LidburyAssociate ProfessorNCEPH – The Australian National UniversityAustraliaWe need a centre like ECVAAM to support non-animal innovation for biomedical research.
Thomas LuechtefeldCEOToxTrack IncUnited States 
James RathmanProfessorOhio State UniversityUSA 
Yanitza TroselResearcherSunnybrook Research InstituteCanadaStart using mimic organ environments to test more basic system, then start increasing the complexity.
Pandora PoundResearch DirectorSafer Medicines TrustUK 
Brigitte Franke-BrayIndependent Consultant Pharmaceutical MedicineFreelanceSwitzerland 
Pelin CandarlioguIndependent Consultant on the use of NAMS3D and 3RsUKStandardisation guidelines followed with a qualification framework for specific context of use and independent test centres that will evaluate and qualify different NAMs for regulatory acceptance
Dr Lilas CourtotScience ManagerAnimal Free Research UKUnited-Kingdom 
Francesca PistollatoSenior Strategist – Biomedical scienceHSI EuropeItalyThe transition towards human-relevant non-animal methods and models will help increase societal impact of funded research, in order to make scientific results really useful and translatable to human diseases and physiology.
Manuela CassottaBiologist Medical writerOSA (Oltre la Sperimentazione Animale)Italy 
Dr. Christiane HohenseeSubject specialist for Animal-free Research MethodsFederal Association ip People for Animal RightsGermany                         

Regards Mark

EU: PR – AGRIFISH: Member States call for a Fur Free Europe.

AGRIFISH: Member States call for a Fur Free Europe

26 June 2023

Press Release

A majority of Member States called today for a ban on fur farming and asked the European Commission (EC) to examine the possibility of a ban on the placement of farmed fur products on the European market, supporting the recently submitted Fur Free Europe ECI.

During today’s Agriculture and Fisheries Council (AGRIFISH), the Austrian, German and Netherlands delegations submitted an information note, supported by the Belgian, Cyprus, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg and Slovak delegations, calling for a ban on fur farming and to examine the possibility of introducing a ban on the sale and marketing of farmed fur products. The paper then received the support of seven other Member States during the meeting.

It’s the second time that the Council expressed its favour for an end to fur farming. Indeed back in 2021, the signatories of another information note called on the EC to take action to permanently end fur farming in the EU based on animal welfare, ethics as well as health risks for humans and animals. 

The new call comes just after the formal submission of the successful Fur Free Europe ECI which collected more than 1.5 million validated signatures in less than 10 months. 

19 Member States have already totally or partially banned or strictly regulated fur farming, sometimes with phasing-out periods. However, the lack of harmonisation in the EU undermines those very measures: fur farming can be “outsourced” with farms moving to other Member States, as a result, distorting the internal market. Moreover, it’s important not only to ban fur farming but the placement of farmed fur products on the European market, in order to ensure that fur produced under similarly cruel conditions in third countries is not sold within the EU.

The Member States called on the EC to uphold its commitment to pay “full regard to the welfare of animals” in line with Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The note also refers to the EC’s commitment to end caged farming systems for other animals and how maintaining these systems for fur farms would be incongruous. They emphasised that under no conditions can the welfare of wild animals on fur farms be protected.

A number of scientists have also called on the European Commission to end such practices saying that the significant danger for humans and terrible suffering for animals requires urgent and proportionate action.

The support for a Fur Free Europe is yet again across the board: citizens, scientists and Member States spoke up against this cruel and unnecessary practice. With the constant decline in fur production since the last decade, followed by a sharp decrease due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the fur industry has had a low impact in the EU economy, and therefore an economic argument holds no ground. There is no way the EC can ignore such clear calls, now it’s the time to turn them into action and include the bans in the new Kept Animals Regulation.

Reineke Hameleers, CEO, Eurogroup for Animals

Regards Mark

EU: Import and production of horsemeat under cruel conditions must stop.

Import and production of horsemeat under cruel conditions must stop

AWF

Investigation

The latest investigations by the Animal Welfare Foundation (AWF), Animals’ Angels USA and Tierschutzbund Zürich (TSB) reveal the mistreatment of horses slaughtered in Canada and Uruguay for European consumption. Thanks to these investigations, and in collaboration with a coalition of animal protection organisations, we are calling for an end to the import and production of horsemeat derived from cruel treatment.

Horsemeat from Canada

Half of the horses slaughtered in Canada come from the United States. EU meat export rules require American horses to be kept in feedlots for six months before slaughter to gain weight. This results in numerous health problems (painful hooves, metabolic diseases, ect.). 

“In the course of our on-site investigations we found on several occasions that horses were limping, suffering from laminitis and had died as a result of their illnesses or injuries,” explains Sabrina Gurtner, project manager at AWF. Mares and stallions are mixed. They also take in pregnant animals. “The chances of foals surviving in the feedlots are slim. We have found foals that were sick in summer and froze to death at birth in winter,” recalls Sabrina Gurtner.

Horsemeat from Uruguay

In a recent two-year investigation by AWF and TSB, conducted in parallel with a pre-announced EU inspection, all three EU-certified slaughterhouses in the country were subject to overt and covert observations before, during and after the EU visit. “Our research shows that the EU audits are manipulated through extensive preparations,” reports Sabrina Gurtner. 

What is particularly striking is that only a fraction of the horses are in the slaughterhouse pastures during the audits. “They’re placed in green pastures, sheltered from the weather. But that’s not the reality before and after the inspection visits. Once the inspectors have left, the horses are sent back to dusty, dirty fields, often without roughage and sometimes even without water.” Workers were also observed, beating the horses when the audit was over.

Problem: traceability and food safety

Together with AWF and the other members of the coalition, we condemn the inadequate traceability of horses in meat production abroad. There is no identification system for horses. The last owner, usually the horse dealer, provides information on the medication and origin of the horses he sells to slaughterhouses. “People rely on the honesty of the sellers. This paves the way for systematic fraud and puts EU consumers at risk,” criticises Sabrina Gurtner. 

These investigations clearly demonstrate that animal welfare and traceability issues remain unresolved for the import of horsemeat from Uruguay and Canada. We therefore call on the European Commission to stop imports of horsemeat from these countries, as well as from all countries that do not comply with EU requirements.

Sign the petition – Demand an import suspension of cruelly produced horsemeat from overseas!

From stable to fork: EU Horse Meat Imports (updated version)

BROWSE TO THIS PUBLICATION

Regards Mark

Denmark: Big Positive – Huge win! Denmark agrees to phase out fast-growing broiler chickens.

Huge win! Denmark agrees to phase out fast-growing broiler chickens

The Danish government and key Danish political parties have agreed to phase out the state procurement of fast-growing chickens, and vowed to back a ban on the farming of fast-growing broilers at EU level.

This landmark move will significantly improve the welfare of the nation’s broiler chickens. Fast-growing broilers cannot live a good life, as due to their fast-growing nature, they suffer from a range of problems from the moment they are born – from injuries to lameness and heart issues. For this reason, animal protection NGOs across Europe have been campaigning for years to outlaw fast-growing broiler breeds in the EU’s animal welfare legislation.

Denmark proved to be on the forefront of the fight for better animal protection last week when a new political agreement was announced, with four key points to:

  • Establish a working group shedding light on animal welfare challenges in relation to the production of broiler chickens in Denmark
  • Phase out the production of fast-growing broilers at EU level
  • Campaign under the auspices of the State Animal Welfare Label with effect from 2023. The campaign must contribute to promoting demand for slow-growing broilers
  • Phase out the Danish government’s procurement of fast-growing broilers.

The working group will prepare a report on the animal welfare standards in Danish broiler production, including the conditions for parent animals. The working group’s report is part of the overall effort to phase-out the production of fast-growing broilers.

It’s particularly notable that the Danish government openly declared their support for a ban at EU level and are actively engaged in achieving it, in recognition of the overwhelming majority of EU citizens who wish animals were better protected in the EU. 

The initiative to take decisive action on broiler welfare is part of a larger animal welfare package that will be announced before summer this year, according to the Danish Minister for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Jacob Jensen. 

We welcome this initiative together with our Danish member, Dyrenes Beskyttelse, who has been working towards achieving a ban on fast-growing broiler chickens in Denmark for years (press release available here). This move from Denmark proves a strong commitment to animal welfare from Member States, and strengthens the case for ambitious revised animal welfare legislation.
Broiler chickens have – deservedly – been taking the spotlight recently, with Animal Equality securing a vote from the PETI Committee last month to keep a petition on outlawing fast-growing broiler chickens open. Read more here.

Regards Mark

EU: Broiler chickens: why are these innocent beings suffering by the billions?

Broiler chickens: why are these innocent beings suffering by the billions?

It’s a difficult life for broiler chickens in Europe’s farming systems. Not only are these poor birds reared to grow incredibly fast – so they’re ready for slaughter after just six weeks of life – but they’re subjected to painful stunning practices, arduous journeys and awful habitats, too. As one of the most widely farmed and consumed species in Europe, it’s critical the Commission takes their welfare seriously in their ongoing revision to the animal welfare legislation. Billions of lives hang in the balance.

Broiler chickens are incredible animals. They’re clever, have amazing memories, and can form close bonds with their peers. But to see the way they are farmed across Europe, you’d think they were little more than robots – crammed into dark rooms with nothing to do, no room to move, and raised to be slaughtered in just a six-week timeframe. 

It’s a shocking lifestyle to imagine… and an even more shocking one to watch up-close.

What are some of the key issues broiler chickens face in Europe’s farming systems?

The stats listed below are from our 2021 No Animal Left Behind report.

Around 90% of the EU’s farmed broiler chickens are raised in intensive systems, which are riddled with problems. Here are just a few of the most concerning issues for this species in the sector. 

Broiler chickens are being bred to grow too quickly

95% of the broiler chickens currently being reared on factory farms are ‘fast-growing’ breeds, which means they’re bred to grow very quickly and reach slaughter weight in just five to six weeks. 

These poor beings cannot live a good life. Due to their fast-growing nature, they’re in constant discomfort, and commonly suffer from problems such as lameness, heart failure, metabolic disorders, and heat stress. These health problems are a direct result of their genetics, which means the only solution is to phase out the farming of fast-growing broiler chicken breeds entirely. 

Broiler chickens are rarely given adequate space or access to the outdoors

Most broiler chickens live in horrible confinement. Thousands of birds are routinely crammed into the same small, dark spaces in factory farms, with the European Commission currently allowing stocking densities for up to 42 kg/m2 in its legislation. 

The findings of the EFSA scientific opinion on broiler welfare point to the fact that stocking densities over 11 kg/m2 creates significant welfare problems for broiler chickens, with common issues including they’re more likely to contract footpad dermatitis, will have more difficulties with walking, and struggle to express their natural behaviours. Furthermore, high stocking densities cause chickens to suffer from overheating, as well as subject them to unhygienic conditions that are a threat to their health (as they’re surrounded by a much higher volume of litter than if they lived in smaller groups). 

The needs and natures of broiler chickens are being ignored 

Broiler chickens are feeling, curious and engaged creatures with a range of physical and emotional needs – just like any other sentient being.

However, these needs are far from being met across European factory farms. Billions of broiler chickens live indoors without any form of entertainment (such as perches or straw bales), and with no room to exercise, play or socialise naturally. Because of this, they have almost no opportunities to have positive experiences in their lifetimes.

Broiler chickens are being transported alive by the billions 

Did you know that poultry makes up over 90% of live animal transports each year? 

Many are broiler chickens, as they are frequently transported across Europe to reach slaughterhouses. Despite the huge number of them being forced to undergo long and arduous journeys annually, poultry is rarely considered in conversations about live animal transport, meaning these birds are suffering in silence. 

Broiler chickens are being slaughtered in horrific ways 

Industrially farmed broiler chickens are not granted the dignity of a pain-free death. Countless of them are subjected to a cruel and ineffective form of ‘waterbath stunning’ before they are sent to slaughter, where they often killed by having their throats cut – some while still fully conscious:

Clearly, the welfare laws for broiler chickens need to be heavily updated

Broiler chickens are farmed at a gigantic scale across Europe – yet as the above points show, the conditions in which they’re reared are far from acceptable. It’s absolutely critical that the European Commission focuses on this neglected species, and writes strong and robust laws for their welfare as they continue with their revision of the animal welfare legislation.

Emphasising the critical nature of the changes needed, our members have been campaigning for better lives for broiler chickens for years. Over in Sweden in 2022, Djurens Rätt launched an incredibly popular campaign exploring the issues these birds commonly experience: 

This campaign won our award for ‘Best Campaign’ at the Eurogroup for Animals Annual General Meeting this year.

Members including EqualiaLAV and Essere Animali have also published several investigations that shine a light on the horrors industrially farmed broiler chickens are exposed to, sparking outrage and signalling a clear need to adapt the Commission’s laws for their welfare – and enforce them across the EU. 

Their voices have been impactful. We’re now beginning to see changes made and interest in the subject politically: at a PETI Committee last month, for example, Animal Equality managed to keep the petition to outlaw fast-growing broiler breeds open. More recently – just last week – the Danish government agreed to phase out the state procurement of fast-growing broiler chickens, and to back a ban at EU level. Over in Sweden this year, the Swedish National Agency for Public Procurement included standards for higher welfare chicken breeds in line with European Chicken Commitment.

This is amazing progress for broiler chickens, but to change their lives at the kind of scale needed across the entirety of Europe, the European Commission must create standards for their welfare that all Member States must follow.

The European Commission must write species-specific legislation for broiler chickens! Do you agree? 

Some of the most important changes they should make to the welfare laws for broiler chickens are: 

Banning fast-growing broiler breeds

Banning ‘waterbath stunning’

Limiting stocking densities in farming systems following EFSA recommendations

Ensuring they have access to enrichment materials and the outdoors, so they can lead fulfilling lives

Putting measures in place to make sure all welfare laws for broiler chickens are sufficiently enforced across Europe.

It’s time to ring in a brighter era for broiler chickens in the EU and beyond. Are you with us? 

We’re working to ensure all kept species are considered by the European Commission in their update to the animal welfare laws! Learn more here.

Regards Mark

England: 6/7/23 – Back !

6/7/23

Hi all; just to give you an update; I  have just come out of hospital after a 2 week stay.  Old cycling leg injury which has always caused some problems.

I will try to get back on track over the next few days, but as you will appreciate, 2 weeks worth of e mails to get through also.

Bad news that Zac has resigned from government as he has no faith in Rishi and the environment – I fully agree with him and I know this is yet another issue that the Tories will pay very heavily for at the next general Election which will probably be within the next year or soon after.

Zac Goldsmith resigns accusing Sunak of being ‘uninterested’ in environment | Zac Goldsmith | The Guardian

Regards Mark

In the meantime ……

Free Tibet !

Watch on Youtube – Read some the comments below the video – a reflection of what this song means to many.