butbutbutbutbut … Seriously, is Chris the best you’ve got?!? You’ve got to be kidding…

With thanks to Stacey as always; Regards Mark

Sadly, we know you’re not kidding, but imagine being so proudly opposed to decreasing suffering that you honestly believe Chris is your weapon-of-choice against veganism. What an absolute clown, to boast you don’t eat “veal” or cats, but eating other victims, including dairy victims, is what – ? An exercise in demonstrating how absolutely absurd and desperate you are to continue causing unimaginable suffering. And, please, tobacco, alcohol, driving, etcetcetc., ad nauseum, don’t REQUIRE victims, but ALL animal exploitation is related and fuels “other” animal exploitation, and it ALL requires victims, including their suffering and violent death.

And feigning indignation while being morally outraged at the perceived “equality towards human animals and non-human animals” is inherently based in the “meat eaters” comparison of human and non-human animals, not vegans’: yes, Chris, YOU’RE making the comparison, it’s only “problematic” when you think vegans are equating them, and I know this because, for example, except for vegans, nobody EVER criticizes nonvegans who benefit from equating nonhuman animals with human animals, but then arbitrarily dismiss similarities to attempt to justify animal suffering and violent death, like vivisectionists do, or animal farmers who claim to care about animals more than their own children but then kill and eat the same animals anyway. And if you don’t eat “veal” (ie, calves, unprofitable casualties of the dairy industry that you DO support and celebrate) because eating infants is “cruel”, are you then guilty of comparing calves to humans, equalizing them? Or is that argument only acceptable when YOU use it in some asinine dimension where you actually make sense?

And what in the AF is a “militant” vegan? One who challenges your cruel behaviours. Right? Like a “militant” opposed to FGM or a “militant” opposed to wrongful incarceration or a “militant” opposed to violence? “Militant” is how animal consumers treat their animal victims: body violation and intrusion, separation of child from mother, and concluding the animal’s brief life of exploitation with violent death. THAT’S “militant”. How people like Chris can use the word “militant” to describe people who DON’T violate, abuse, and kill others is astounding, that he and others don’t recognize their own hypocrisy surrounding their abusively MILITANT actions inflicted on animals is absolutely bizarre.

And COME. ON. Really? Animals are killed in better ways than humans? Are you determined to look as rational as the crusty grossness on the bottoms of your shoes? You’re not only threatened by decency but by logic, too? You have the privileged audacity and human supremacist position of NEVER EVER EVER having to experience a forced violent, terrorizing death in a slaughterhouse for people to eat you.

Were you one of the ones left behind??? Just by odds you should have at least hit one good point by now, but that you haven’t leads me to believe that you evading logic and facts so consistency must be one of your invented superpowers. I mean, effing yikes, Chris.

In a globally indoctrinated, normalized violent world that acceptably causes and celebrates incalculable suffering and death of animals, don’t be a Chris. Be an Ed. Or look like an idiot because any baby vegan could destroy Chris’s clumsy and mindless argument, and when you don’t actually have a legitimate answer, falling back on the BuT i cAn kILl BeCAuSe pErSOnaL cHOicE is a tired, overused, irrational trope. JFC. Seriously. SL

    Source Earthling Ed YouTube

Order my debut best-selling book This is Vegan Propaganda (And Other Lies the Meat Industry Tells You) here: http://earthlinged.org/orderbook

If you find my work valuable, you can become a regular supporter or make a one-off contribution through the following links (thank you!): http://earthlinged.org/support & http://patreon.com/earthlinged

Find out more about what I do & my different projects + sign up to my newsletter: http://earthlinged.org

Download my FREE e-book: http://earthlinged.org/ebook

Make the switch to vegan & get all of the support you need: http://switchtovegan.co.uk Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37ZtGVS

Download Your FREE Vegan PDF HERE
Order a FREE vegan kit HERE
Dairy-Free Info HERE
Take the Dairy-Free Challenge HERE
Click HERE for more Dairy-Free
Fish alternatives can be found HERE
Learn about eggs HERE
Find bacon alternatives HERE and HERE
Take PETA’s Cruelty-Free Shopping Guide along with you next time you head to the store! The handy guide will help you find humane products at a glance.
Order a FREE copy HERE
Searching for Cruelty-Free Cosmetics, Personal-Care Products, Vegan Products, or more?
Click HERE to search.
Free PDF of Vegan & Cruelty-Free Products/Companies HERE
Click HERE to find out How to Wear Vegan!
Want to do more than go vegan? Help others to do so! Click below for nominal, or no, fees to vegan literature that you can use to convince others that veganism is the only compassionate route to being an animal friend:
PETA HERE
Vegan Outreach HERE
Get your FREE Activist Kit from PETA, including stickers, leaflets, and guide HERE
Have questions? Click HERE    

England: Super-rare Greenland shark that washed up on UK beach may be at least 100 years old.

© Provided by Live Science The rare Greenland shark being moved after it stranded in Cornwall.

A rare Greenland shark that washed up on a U.K. beach could be at least 100 years old, but experts aren’t sure why it became stranded.

The dead shark was first spotted on the sand in Newlyn Harbour, Cornwall, on the southwest coast of England, on March 13. But before experts could examine it, the tide came in and took the carcass back out to sea, according to Cornwall Wildlife Trust Twitter posts. 

The shark was then rediscovered floating off the coast of Cornwall on March 15 by a recreational boating company called Mermaid Pleasure Trips and was brought back to shore. Greenland sharks are rarely sighted in the U.K., and this is the country’s second recorded Greenland shark stranding.  

“Even though it’s a sad event when these beautiful, spectacular animals do strand on our beaches, it’s such a valuable opportunity for us to study them,” Abby Crosby, a marine conservation officer who manages the marine strandings network at the Cornwall Wildlife Trust, told Live Science. 

Related: The weirdest creatures to wash ashore

Greenland sharks (Somniosus microcephalus) live in the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans up to 8,684 feet (2,647 meters) below the surface, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). A 2016 study published in the journal Science estimated that these sharks could live at least 272 years, but scientists still have much to learn about the elusive species.

The shark that washed up in Cornwall was a juvenile female that measured 13 feet (4 m) long and weighed 628 pounds (285 kilograms). Although researchers have yet to determine the shark’s age, Greenland sharks typically become sexually mature when they’re around 150 years old, according to the 2016 study. The animals continue to grow as they age, and adults can be up to 24 feet (7.3 m) long, according to the St. Lawrence Shark Observatory (ORS).  

James Barnett, a veterinary pathologist from the Cornwall Marine Pathology Team, carried out a postmortem of the shark on March 16 for the Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme (CSIP), a national program that partners with Cornwall Wildlife Trust’s Marine Strandings Network. 

“It looked like it probably live-stranded,” Barnett told Live Science. In other words, the shark was still alive when it washed up, and it died on the beach. “It obviously hadn’t eaten for some time,” Barnett said. “The stomach was totally empty.” 

Barnett noted that the shark showed possible signs of septicemia, an infection in the blood, but it’s not yet clear why the shark wasn’t eating and ended up in shallow waters off Cornwall. There are a variety of reasons, including disease, that can explain why marine animals become stranded and die on beaches, but the movement of ocean currents and other marine conditions also play a part in bringing living and dead animals to shore.

“The majority of our strandings are common dolphins and porpoises, and they would have all died within a kilometer [0.6 mile] of our coastline, if that,” Crosby said. Because Greenland sharks usually swim far from the coast, the likelihood of one being swept in by the right current and weather conditions is really rare, she added. 

Barnett said this is the first time a Greenland shark has been given a necropsy in the U.K., to his knowledge. “They are a species that we just don’t encounter,” he said. Samples taken from the shark will help inform Greenland shark research, such as studies investigating their life history and diet, Rob Deaville, project manager for CSIP at the Zoological Society of London, said in a statement.  

Originally published on Live Science.

Regards Mark

So, Why aren’t there polar bears in Antarctica?

© Provided by Live Science Polar bear on melting ice in Svalbard, Norway_Paul Souders via Getty Images

The Arctic and Antarctica, while similar habitats in some ways, are home to very different creatures. Both poles host a variety of seal and whale species, but only the Arctic is home to Earth’s largest bear, the polar bear.

Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and their tumbly cubs can be found around the Arctic Circle in Alaska, Canada, Greenland (part of Denmark), Norway, Russia and, occasionally, Iceland. A polar bear’s fur is specially suited for temperatures that can dip below minus 22 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 30 degrees Celsius). They live on ice for most of their lives, feeding on fat-rich seals that keep them energized for long periods between meals.

Antarctica also has sea ice, cold temperatures and seals. So why aren’t there any polar bears on the southernmost continent?

The answer has to do with evolution and the geologic history of Earth.

Related: How do emperor penguin dads stop their eggs from freezing?

Bears are largely a Northern Hemisphere phenomenon,” said Andrew Derocher, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Alberta in Canada who has studied polar bears for nearly 40 years. Aside from the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) of South America, bears appear only in the Northern Hemisphere. There’s no specific reason for this, just that some species evolve in some places and some don’t. “Biogeography is full of oddities,” Derocher said. “Some species made it to new places and some didn’t.”

For polar bears specifically, there was never a time in their evolutionary history when the North and South poles were connected by ice (or land, for that matter). People say polar bears are the “biggest terrestrial carnivore in the world, and yet they’re not a terrestrial species at all,” Derocher told Live Science. The big, white bears live on sea ice for almost their entire lives, only occasionally coming ashore to breed.

Polar bears are, evolutionarily, a relatively young species. They evolved from a common ancestor of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) sometime between 5 million and 500,000 years ago, Derocher said. But even 5 million years ago, the continents were in similar positions to where they are today, so polar bears never got the opportunity to travel from pole to pole. The closest landmass to Antarctica is the southern tip of South America, which includes Chile and Argentina. To get to Antarctica, polar bears would have to cross the treacherous Drake Passage. The area is also known for powerful storms and rough seas as cold water from the south runs into warm water from the north.

But if polar bears got the opportunity, would they survive on the South Pole?

To Derocher, the answer is simple: “They would have so much fun in Antarctica.”

In the Arctic, polar bears feed on seals and the occasional bird or egg. Antarctica is abundant in all three, with six seal species and five penguin species. Plus, none of those animals have evolved to be wary of large, land-roving predators. The Antarctic landscape would be a free-for-all buffet for a polar bear — which is why no one should ever bring polar bears there. Their voracious appetite, combined with the local faunas’ ignorance of large land predators, would likely lead to ecological collapse. It’s probably best for the great white bear to remain in the north.

Originally published on Live Science.

Regards Mark

England: SAV To Go To Archive – Posts Only On This Site (WAV) Now.

Dear all;

As you can see from this site, there have been some changes this week.

I need to explain one major change a little more; but which I think is now essential.

A Serbian stray dog is captured by ‘Shinters’ (Dog Catchers)

Back in 2005 I became very involved in the issue of stray dogs and cats in Serbia (Europe).  I made contact, and worked with the wonderful ‘Slavica’ who was a Serbian activist and stray dog shelter owner. 

Slavica

To begin with, we just worked together simply writing protest letters etc to the government on the issue of strays abuse.  But deep down inside I very much felt that more needed to be done in order to give stray animals a voice.  So, in conjunction with Slavica, who was a medical doctor specialising in tumours, I set up a site which was named ‘Serbian Animals Voice’, or SAV. 

Here is the link to the site:  Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) | a voice for the voiceless if you wish to have a look.

Slavica (pictured above) was the prime contact at the Serbian end; she was a brilliant campaigner; friend and top voice for the animals.  So, in the early days, our language differences (I am English) and the mutual understanding of issues was ‘difficult’ in some respects to say the least. Often we had to check and re check what message(s) we wanted to get across, because of our worries that what was being experienced in Serbia would not be represented correctly in the posts that we published on SAV.

But gradually over time, Slavica and I easily understood each other in the ways of thinking; what we wanted to say and in sharing our common objective of getting a public light to shine on the treatment and suffering of the poor Serbian strays.

Very sadly, like all good people who are taken far too early; we lost Slavica recently; but on a good note, before her untimely death, she did witness the closure of the fur farming industry in Serbia; something which we had worked together hard on as information suppliers to the crew at ‘Respect for Animals’ who are based here in Nottingham, England – Respect for Animals | Campaign against animal fur – Fur for Animals

 

Serbian fur farming – serbia | Search Results | Respect for Animals – an issue which we were involved with.

So, over the past few years, SAV has been operating simply as an additional link source for visitors to divert over to this site, WAV.  There is nothing new about the Serbian situation. The whole issue of why SAV was founded in 2005 and existed; which was to show all actions we took to try and prevent Serbian stray animal suffering; kind of got lost in this link supplier only to WAV posts.

So now I feel that the SAV site must remain; but in the form of an ‘archive’ site only; in order that anyone can read and select from the list of hundreds of issues that we fought for in the Balkans.  On the left hand side of the SAV site,  Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) | a voice for the voiceless , you can see a long list of ‘Archives’ associated with our work.  In a lot of cases it does not make pleasant reading and the photos / videos are often graphic; but this is the reality of strays in Serbia, as with animal abuse the world over.  Further, I want the site to remain as a tribute to the incredible work which was undertaken by Slavica in Serbia.

A bear held captive at the illegal zoo. Note the living conditions.

In 2011 – We exposed and eventually shut down an illegal zoo – Serbia: 27/07/11 – Investigations Reveal An Illegal Zoo Confirmed Operating, Combined With A Minister Who Appears Unable To Perform His Job Requirements ! | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Serbian sheep are exported, despite the government saying they are not involved.

Around 2015, despite threats from the Serbian government about closing down stray dog shelters, we exposed that Serbian sheep were being exported live.  The government threats eventually came to nothing as we got the EU involved; all the stray dog shelters stayed safe:

Serbia: It Now Appears The Sheep Exported Live To Israel WERE From Serbia; Despite The Threats. | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

 

Serbia: Breaking News – Serbia Exports Live Sheep To Israel. | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

And of course, the closure of the Serbian fur farming industry.

As I say, all this and loads more can be found on the SAV site.   SAV is now going to be an archive of work undertaken primarily in Serbia and other Balkans states, it will not continue to be used solely to promote WAV links only.

Here are a few shortcut links for SAV if you want to look or find out more:

Home – Serbian Animals Voice (SAV) | a voice for the voiceless

Learn about Serbian strays and the law – About Serbian Animals. | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

About Us – About Us. | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

Links to other animal organisations – Animal Org’s | Serbian Animals Voice (SAV)

 

So, from now, all WAV posts will appear directly on this site only, with no cross referencing from SAV; which will remain solely as an archive for Serbian work.

I hope you understand the thinking and subsequent actions;

Remembering Slavica;

Regards Mark

WAV Will Continue.

Dear all; as you can read from Venus, she has departed WAV:

I just want to confirm to all of you that there is now obviously change; but I can also assure you that WAV will continue to publish posts, actions, videos and information whenever possible – things are changing but anything can be overcome if the tenacity remains. I will do all I can to ensure this site is worth a visit.

It is sad day and I thank Venus for all her hard work, articles and dedication to the animal rights movement. and this site

Thanks;

Regards Mark

Enjoy:

USA: Duck Meat and Gray Wolves – Video To Watch and Actions To Take.

Another Grocer Stops Purchases of Duck Meat From Culver Duck Farms

After hearing from PETA, Southeastern Grocers (the parent company of Winn-Dixie) ended purchases from Culver Duck Farms! Ask other companies to reconsider their relationship with the company, as birds will continue to suffer in dank sheds at Culver as long as companies continue to sell their flesh.

Watch whistleblower footage here – and then take action:

Whistleblower Alerts PETA to Suffering at Culver Duck | PETA Investigates

Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves Need Federal Protection—Message Now

There’s good news, and there’s bad news: Although gray wolves in 44 states are once again protected under the Endangered Species Act, those in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and portions of several surrounding states continue to be unprotected. These animals are in danger of potentially being massacred. Help them by contacting the secretary of the interior today.

Update: March 7, 2022
Some good news for gray wolves! On February 10, a U.S. district court reinstated federal protections for gray wolves across much of the country, ruling that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service had failed to show that wolf populations could be maintained once the animals’ protections under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) were removed. Although gray wolves in 44 states will once again be protected under the ESA, those in the Northern Rocky Mountains—Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and portions of several surrounding states—continue to be unprotected by it, even though these states have declared open season on massacring these animals!

Please contact Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland via this online e-mail form and urge her to implement immediate emergency protections for gray wolves and to reinstate full federal protections for them under the ESA.

Take Action:

Contact Interior | U.S. Department of the Interior (doi.gov)

Regards Mark

Venus says goodbye…

Dear Mark, dear followers
and other visitors of this blog,

while Europe is militantly but unsuspectingly engaged in witch hunts against Russia, the animal rights scene proves once again how immature and politically manipulable it is.
Those who do not write, speak or act against Russia set alarm bells ringing in their fellow human beings.

We, the so-called animal rights activists, have always said that “only freedom is species-appropriate”.

At the moment, however, it affects the freedom of people who think differently politically, because it is usually much easier to immediately label them as slobs, lateral thinkers, Nazis and other “pests of the people” if they do not subscribe to the one, global opinion.

It is to despair.
Nowhere else can one evade the officially ordered and submissively accepted dictatorship of opinion.
Like brain damage, this pathology is rampant!

What the heck… with so much maniputation at the political level and obedience at the popular level, we can no longer get it on the right track.

So I say goodbye to this blog and hope that this madness will end soon.
It prevents you and all of us from caring for the animals and their rights, since human freedom has become shit anyway.

My best regards to all, Venus

8,000 animals stranded at sea: NGOs call for systematic approach to end live exports by sea.

17 March 2022

Animals International

Freiburg, 16th March 2022. Animal Welfare Foundation (AWF), Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) and Animals International (AI) have witnessed how an old, former cargo ship with nearly 8,000 animals on board needed to be replaced while at sea. Inadequate European legislation and its poor implementation regularly lead to prolonged suffering of animals exported outside the EU.

On February 23rd, the livestock carrier Spiridon II left Tarragona in Spain. The country is one of the main exporters of live animals in Europe. Around 300 young bulls from France and Spain as well as 7,600 Spanish sheep were on board. Their destination was the Port of Aqaba in Jordan. 

On February 27th, engine problems occurred. The journey was interrupted, and the ship spent three days near Greek ports. Unloading the animals onto European grounds was not an option. Once on the water, they are declared as so-called “export” animals and cannot re-enter the EU. This often leads to tragic consequences, such as the odysseys of Karim Allah and Elbeik in early 2021, where 2,600 calves and cattle were subjected to emergency slaughter. 

Spiridon II was finally brought to Eleusis, near Athens, Greece on March 4. There the 8,000 animals were loaded directly from one vessel to another, namely, the livestock carrier Adel I, via a ramp, on the water. The reason for this manoeuvre at sea was that the port of Eleusis is not authorised to transport animals to third countries. On long journeys like this, there is no veterinarian on board, regardless of the number of animals. This was also the case on Spiridon II. It remains unclear whether the animals were fit to continue the journey to Jordan after 10 days onboard the vessel. It also remains unclear whether unfit animals were emergency euthanised on site.

The livestock vessels currently operating in the EU were converted from car ferries or cargo ships to livestock carriers at the moment when they should have been scrapped because they were too obsolete to continue. They are ancient vessels, operating under suspicious flags, and are poorly designed and maintained. These vessels pose many risks for the safety of the animals, the crew, and the environment.

Maria Boada-Saña, Veterinarian and Project Manager at AWF

This latest event just adds to a long list of problematic live exports. And Spiridon II is just one of too many old vessels with many deficiencies and unexpected problems arising during the journey. NGOs have repeatedly drawn attention to the underlying problems. Emergencies at sea cannot be solved easily and result in longer transports. If the competent authorities lose responsibility for ships that have left port, any unforeseen incident can have tragic consequences, as the example of Elbeik and Karim Allah shows. There should be a systematic approach to solving the problem instead of makeshift solutions for every single case. 

NGOs exposed that during exports by sea, Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on animal transports cannot be complied with. This shows once again that the current legislation and the ruling of the European Court of Justice do not ensure real protection of animals during the entire transport.

Once more, this latest incident reveals the severe flaws of EU’s live animal exports. The horrendous suffering that animals endure during live exports and the all too frequent mechanical problems of the vessels cannot go unnoticed. We urge the EU Commission to take immediate action on this matter. The current revision of the EU’s animal welfare rules presents the perfect opportunity to ban this cruelty once and for all.

Olga Kikou, Head of CIWF EU

Spiridon II remained in the port of Eleusis until March 8, when it left for reparation. The animals who survived the stressful journey so far arrived in Jordan on March 9, to be slaughtered in the most shocking and cruel conditions which are illegal in the EU.

Gabriel Paun, Animals International

Regards Mark

Related Past:

England: RSPCA to bring prosecution against Zouma and brother.

The RSPCA has begun the process of bringing a prosecution against Kurt and Yoan Zouma under the Animal Welfare Act.

West Ham defender Kurt was filmed by his brother Yoan, who plays for Dagenham & Redbridge, slapping and kicking his own cats in a video that was shared on social media. The 27-year-old’s pets were taken away and remain in care.

An RSPCA statement said: “Following a full and thorough investigation, we have started the process of bringing a prosecution against Kurt Zouma and Yoan Zouma under the Animal Welfare Act.

“The two cats continue to be cared for by the RSPCA. We will be in a position to release more information once a court date is confirmed.”

Zouma misses Leicester game due to illness | Souness: Zero sympathyAntonio questions Zouma reaction: ‘Is what he’s done worse than racism?’West Ham fine Zouma after RSPCA take cats | Adidas drops defenderWest Ham back Moyes’ ‘footballing decisions’ over Zouma

A West Ham statement said: “West Ham United is aware of the RSPCA statement in relation to its investigation involving Kurt Zouma. Kurt continues to co-operate fully, supported by the Club.

“It is our understanding that Kurt’s cats have been checked by a vet, are in good health and have suffered no physical injuries. For legal reasons, neither Kurt or the Club will be making any further comment at this time.”

Kurt Zouma apologised for his actions earlier this year. He said: “I also want to say how deeply sorry I am to anyone who was upset by the video. I would like to assure everyone that our two cats are perfectly fine and healthy.

“They are loved and cherished by our entire family, and this behaviour was an isolated incident that will not happen again.”

West Ham were widely criticised for continuing to select Kurt Zouma, including for their Premier League match with Watford less than 24 hours after the video emerged.

Yoan Zouma was suspended by Dagenham in February. A statement said: “Dagenham & Redbridge FC note the decision of the RSPCA to charge Yoan Zouma under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

“Whilst Yoan continues to fully co-operate with the RSPCA, as this matter has now progressed further, Dagenham & Redbridge FC feel it is no longer appropriate for either Yoan or the club to make any further statement.

“Dagenham & Redbridge FC maintain their position in that the club continues to condemn all animal cruelty.”

Dagenham said the defender would be available to play for them after his period of suspension.

“Since the allegation, and whilst investigations were taking place, Dagenham &Redbridge FC took the decision that Yoan should not play football for the club,” the statement continued.

“Four weeks have now elapsed however since the incident, and the club feels that any further suspension from the team would be detrimental to both the club and Yoan. A decision has been made therefore for Yoan to be available to play.

“The club reserves the right to take further action if deemed necessary after conclusion of the court proceedings.”

Regards Mark

Link:  RSPCA to bring prosecution against Zouma and brother (msn.com)

© Getty Yoan Zouma, pictured playing for Barrow in October 2020, has been charged under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, current club Dagenham have said

Past links:

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/?s=zouma

India: Her Spirit Was Completely Broken. The Rescue and Transformation Of A Dying Street Dog Thanks To ‘Animal Aid Unlimited’.

I want to share this video with you from our great friends at ‘Animal Aid Unlimited’ (AAU) in India.

AAU say – We got a call to rescue a street dog who was suffering from severe mange and dehydration. She was unable to stand when we found her curled up in a ball on the side of the street.

Her skin was covered with painful scabs and she had completely lost hope. After several months of treatment, meet beautiful Helen today.

Please donate to save animals in India who had completely lost hope: https://www.animalaidunlimited.org/do…

You can check out all our (WAV) past posts on AAU and watch all the wonderful rescues and recoveries by clicking on:

Search Results for “animal aid unlimited” – World Animals Voice

Note – when you get to the bottom of the first page you can click and go back to earlier posts and videos we have made earlier in the past.

Please do not forget to give a donation if it is possible.

Regards Mark