5/2/20 England 1000Hrs : Climate – London BP HQ Shutdown As Activists Deliver 500 Solar Panels to New CEO.

England

 

Hi Mark – Greenpeace activists have just shut down BP’s headquarters in central London, after delivering 500 solar panels to the new CEO.

They’re here to “welcome” in BP’s new CEO, and show him what he needs to do to tackle the climate emergency: switch BP to 100% renewable energy – or shut the company down! It’s the only way we can get out of this crisis.

Can you help drive this urgent message home to BP’s new CEO? BP really care about their public image, so the bigger we can make this on social media, the more pressure the new CEO will feel.

Around the world, the climate emergency is wreaking havoc on people’s lives. Burning fossil fuels like oil and gas has got us into this mess. And every day, BP are making the crisis worse.

BP already have more fossil fuels on their books than we can afford to burn if we’re to avoid total climate breakdown. But unbelievably, BP are planning to spend $71 billion digging up new oil and gas on top of that. [1]

If BP continue down this path, it will push the climate even closer to breaking point – and that means more frequent and even more severe climate fires and floods. BP must immediately stop digging for new oil and gas and go 100% renewable! Can you help get that message to BP’s new CEO?

 

More news and reading relating to this:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/feb/05/greenpeace-blocks-bp-hq-with-solar-panels-on-new-ceo-first-day

https://news.sky.com/story/bp-hq-temporarily-shut-down-amid-climate-protest-11926756

https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/greenpeace-deliver-500-solar-panels-to-bps-new-ceo-and-shutdown-hq/

 

Germany: 5/2/20 – Contact Details For German Agriculture Ministry.

banane rep deutschlandpg

 

Here is a link to the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture:

At the top left you can read in either German or English – just select.

https://www.bmel.de/EN/Homepage/homepage_node.html;jsessionid=0EBA7248A085CC0E8DBB7490BAFEA764.2_cid288

 

Ferkel

 

On the site it tells us that:

Link – https://www.bmel.de/EN/Animals/AnimalWelfare/animal-welfare_node.html

 

Animal welfare is enshrined as a State goal in the German Basic Law and regulated in the Animal Welfare Act. Under the latter, animal keepers are obliged, in order to promote the welfare of their animals, to comply with the applicable regulations.

Animal welfare is an important issue for the BMEL. The ministry works on developing the existing regulations to support animal welfare. Other examples of ways in which the BMEL promotes animal welfare include sup-porting research projects, investments in livestock husbandry systems that conform to animal welfare principles, and the development of alternatives to animal testing. The ministry also supports and promotes better animal welfare standards – including for animal transportation – at EU and international level.

 

schweine kästen

 

Why then we ask are they attempting to downgrade the methods for keeping intensive pigs ?

You can decide this.  We think you will agree with us rather than them !

 

If you wish to write to the Ministry about their pig keeping proposals, or anything else, then write directly to them at:

poststelle@bmel.bund.de

 

SAMPLE LETTER

 

We have put sample letter together which you could copy, modify and send to the German ministry at https://www.bmel.de/DE/Servicemenue/Kontakt/kontakt_node.html

 

Send by E-Mail:   poststelle@bmel.bund.de

 

You can change the letter to meet your requirements; but please ensure you do not miss the main points.

Please add your name, nationality and address (if you wish).

Here is the sample letter which you can copy and send; modified if you wish:


 

Date:

Sir / Madam;

On your official site you inform us that:

 

Animal welfare is an important issue for the BMEL. The ministry works on developing the existing regulations to support animal welfare. Other examples of ways in which the BMEL promotes animal welfare include sup-porting research projects, investments in livestock husbandry systems that conform to animal welfare principles, and the development of alternatives to animal testing. The ministry also supports and promotes better animal welfare standards – including for animal transportation – at EU and international level.

 

Decent animal welfare stops the cages; this is what over 1.5 million EU citizens want, which (so far) are despised by the EU, because they (the citizens) don’t even get any information about the development of this debate about what they voted for.

Ex-EU parliamentarian Stefan.B.Eck, independent,  initiated the abolition of the painful rabbit breeding and petitioned against it, EU Commissioner Andriukaitis (then responsible) told him: “Stefan, I`m sorry, I can’t do anything for it “.

Then Stefan Eck said in his speech to the Commission:

“The EU Commission must never put the word “morality” in its mouth; never!!”

So, as a ‘Ministry’ responsible for alleged ‘animal welfare’; can you please then explain to me – why them are you attempting to change the regulations relating to intensive pig welfare on 14/2/20 to make things worse for pigs ? – where is your morality, or are you just a legislator for the farming industry and nothing else; regardless of the negative impact your decisions have on animal welfare  ? – your proposals will mean to even deprive pigs of space to stretch their legs ! – there is nothing ‘moral’ from you.

Your proposed approach which will be decided on 14/2 will neither develop existing regulations to IMPROVE animal welfare – in fact it will do quite the opposite; and by attempting to undertake changes to the regulations you are NOT promoting better animal welfare standards !

I would be very keen to hear your reasoning as to why you are attempting to downgrade animal welfare for intensive pig systems; when in fact you should be working to make intensive cage systems a thing of the past.

I request that for anything near to decent welfare standards, you work urgently to move away from intensive cage systems and instead promote free range – Cage Free Systems.

Clearly from your proposals, animal welfare improvements are NOT one of your priorities.

Please do not pretend to me and others that you are working to improve animal welfare when we know that your proposed changes for intensive pig keeping will result in the opposite of that.

Do not lie to us – break the cages and set the pigs and others free into a world of free range.

 

Yours;

Name

Nationality:


 

 

You have until BEFORE 14/2/20 to send a mail to the Ministry – please do not delay.

Regards WAV – 5/2/20.

Germany: 4/2/20 – UPDATE – The German Pig Campaign.

We are currently attempting to get e mail contact details for the Ministry of Agriculture so that you can write to them expressing your disgust at their attempts to change the legislation. We will publish as soon as we have information – WAV.

 

Dear all;

Here is an update on the situation relating to the German pig issue.

 

schweinemast-krankenbucht-6

 

Schweinezucht-PETA-D

 

Please see our recent past posts:

1 This gives an overview of the situation – https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2020/02/01/an-open-letter-to-the-eurogroup-for-animals/

2 And here is a rather dramatic video showing the situation for intensively reared (caged) pigs -WARNING: Distressing Images –   https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2020/02/03/germany-please-make-the-connection/

 

Over the last few days (early February) we have collaborated with our good friends at Compassion In World Farming (UK) – https://www.ciwf.org.uk/ and also established very promising links with contacts at CIWF Italia (Italy) – https://www.ciwf.it/ to further actions on this issue. CIWF UK are currently running the campaign to End the Cage Age right across Europe. Please read more and see video footage at – https://www.ciwf.org.uk/our-campaigns/end-the-cage-age/

 

And so on the (German) subject of extending the pig boxes for 17 years:

As Venus has rightly written in communications today:

It is a first-class crime that these metal prisons are still allowed in a country like Germany, which – at least in theory – has anchored ‘animal welfare’ as a state goal in the Basic Law.

In the previous version of the Animal Welfare / Animal Husbandry Ordinance (1), Section 5 determines Section 24 (4)…is clear:

 

(Pig) Box stands must be designed so that:

– the pigs cannot injure themselves and

– Each pig can stand free, lie down and stretch its head and side members.

 

schweinekasten Fabrik

 

A total of three courts have already ruled that the sows must lie down in the crate and that the limbs must be able to stretch out on their side. Anytime and unhindered.

 

The legal regulation was so clear that the Magdeburg Administrative Court, the Higher Administrative Court of the State of Saxony-Anhalt and the Federal Administrative Court expressly approved this in the years 2014 to 2016.

 

Now the Federal Government, together with Agriculture Minister Julia Klöckner (CDU), wants to delete this part of the regulation, which provides that the sows in the crates may at least stretch their limbs and their heads in a lying position. Only in this way (by deletion) she can legalize her decision to keep these cages for another 15/17 years.

 

Schweinestall---Kastenstand-34414-detailp

 

The German Minister’s proposal is really dangerous for different reasons:

–           It would legalise the suffering of millions of German sows in narrow stalls for the next 15-17 years and to do that it would set a precedent, i.e. worsen existing legislation by deleting the national legislation paragraph saying that sows should stretch their legs. A very dangerous precedent, which could then be repeated on other issues.

–           It could undermine ECI asks as Germany will soon hold the presidency of the EU.

 

We comment – As an EU ‘civilised’ nation; should Germany be attempting at all costs to improve its animal welfare, rather than taking steps back; as this proposal would ? – How are nations in the Far East (for example) expected to improve their welfare when Germany adopts this kind of negative stance ?

 

That’s what it’s about here.

 

The Federal Council should have voted on this (practically unlawful) extension on December 2, 2019 (i.e. approval would allow the crates for another 17 years).

The decision was postponed to February 14 2020, because we (in the animal welfare movement) protested and blessed Klöckner with petitions and demos and war over the Internet.

The decision of February 14th will be binding. How sad that this is the same date (14/2) when you should show love and respect – Valentines Day.

Many groups and citizens from all over the EU, and also other nations, are trying to make their voices heard about this very important issue before, and on 14th February.

In view of the 27th of January 2020, (a session of the German Agri Committee) the 27th was a ‘non-public one’ and little has been revealed after it.

 

schweine kästen

 

What we know so far:

 

  1. The Agri Committee seems to have made many amendments to the draft sow bill but has still approved it (it could have rejected it)
  2. IMPORTANT Positive – But it also seems that the Land Sachsen Anhalt managed to have an ‘amendment’ approved which basically says that sows should be able to stretch their legs during the phase-out period!
  3. Phase out period for sow stalls should have been shortened from 17 to 10 years- for farrowing crates no change.

 

So, point 2. Above (the Amendment) could potentially mean the end of the Minister’s proposal. Since the whole construction of her new regulation was based on making current sow stalls legal. And this can be done only by deleting the paragraph mentioning leg-stretching.  The submitted Proposal changes this and says that sows should be able to stretch their legs during the phase-out period

 

Ferkel

 

It is getting legal and becoming a strong fight by both pro animal welfare advocates; and also the government who wish change. With the Point 2 issue above we (in the welfare movement) are hopeful of a positive end result; but actions will continue to the end. For the pigs, regardless of the result; their confinement will not end. – the ‘Eternal Treblinka’ policy.

CIWF and its partners from the ECI and Eurogroup coalitions will participate in a protest on the 14th in front of the Bundesrat, an action being coordinated by friends at Four Paws – https://www.four-paws.org/campaigns-topics/topics/farm-animals . They are also exploring additional actions.

So; whoever you are and wherever you are, if you want to help get part justice for the caged pigs then search the web and try to take part in written or physical protests. There is one final chance on 14/2 and it needs to be in the favour of the pigs that are suffering enough now as it is, let alone with this changed legislation.

Please keep up the fight and be a voice until then at least – there is very little time left.

 

Regards to all of you from Mark, Venus (WAV) – Annamaria, Philip and all the crew at CIWF (UK and Italy).

 

 

 

 

 

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2019/10/23/germany-13-million-pigs-end-up-in-the-garbage/ 

 

 

Image result for piglet sufferin intensive"

Photo – CIWF

‘Dirty Secret’ – It Is Still Cheaper to Kill Male Calves Than it is to Rear Them.

EPym0LpX0AE8cC_

Have You Seen This Baby ? – Vegan Street

 

 

The Dirty Dairy Secret – It is still cheaper to kill male calves than it is to rear them.

 

Thanks for sending Stacey – https://our-compass.org/2020/02/03/dairys-dirty-secret-its-still-cheaper-to-kill-male-calves-than-to-rear-them/

Please note the use of euphemistic terms and phrases such as “early disposal”, ie., killing infants; “it”, ie, a male, him. Please also note a serious lack of ethics or consideration for sentient beings and the “victimized” farmer who is unable to kill the calves herself but has no issue with hiring others to do so.

Please never forget that caring does not equal killing, if farmers cared for the animals,  they would not exploit or kill them; there is no legitimate way to consider the well-being of an animal if you exploit and kill him/her. Terms such as “red tractor”, “high welfare”, “cage-free”, etc., are phrases meant to console human conscience, while animals are still exploited: subjected to confinement; inflicted with mutilations; separation of mother and child, causing extreme distress and psychological trauma; stealing of milk for other species; and abbreviated lives ended in violent death.

Here’s your dairy:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/26/dairy-dirty-secret-its-still-cheaper-to-kill-male-calves-than-to-rear-them (UK Newspaper – London)

Dairy farms need female cows to produce milk but with little demand for male calves many farmers can’t afford to keep them beyond birth

The number of male calves being killed straight after birth is on the rise again, despite efforts by the dairy industry to end the practice known as ‘the dirty secret’.

A Guardian analysis shows that it can cost a farmer up to £30 per calf to sell it on for beef or veal, while early disposal costs just £9. A growing number of farmers feel compelled to take the latter option, with 95,000 killed on-farm in the most recent set of figures.

Dairy farms depend on female cows to produce milk, so when male calves are born, they are surplus to requirements and farmers are currently faced with few options.

They can immediately dispose of the calf, either by shooting it themselves or contracting a knackerman to do it [licensed slaughter business that will kill or collect dead farm animals]. They can sell the calf to be raised for veal or beef. Or they can sell the calf for live export. A few farms are experimenting with keeping the calves with the mothers for longer, but this is an expensive and rarely chosen option.

Early disposal is known as the ‘dirty secret’ by farmers, and none relish it. But keeping the calf to sell on to be raised for beef or veal means the farmer will have to rear them for two to four weeks to a good enough weight to interest buyers, at a typical cost of around £2 a day, with selling prices at market as low as £25-40. This doesn’t include extra costs such as getting the calf to market, registering its birth or veterinary bills.

In contrast, shooting the calf costs as little as £9, including the cost of the knackerman who will incinerate the body, or in some cases send them to kennels to be turned into dog food. Calves shot on farm cannot enter the human food chain and farmers can only dispose of calves themselves if they have a licensed incinerator.

Dairy farmers in the UK have been under extreme pressure to cut costs for the last two decades, with milk long used as a loss leader by supermarkets to draw shoppers into their stores. “Some farmers might do the maths and figure out after rearing, transport and time away from the farm it might not add up,” says Chris Dodds, from the Livestock Auctioneers’ Association (LAA).

The estimated 95,000 calves disposed on-farm represents 19% of the male dairy calves born, according to the most recent figures from the dairy industry body AHDB. In 2013 the number had fallen to 13% of male dairy calves born from a previous 21%. The exact numbers shot on farm is difficult to collate as farmers destroying calves within a few days of birth on farm do not need to register the birth – and neither does the company collecting and disposing of the animal.

One dairy farmer, who asked to remain anonymous, explained to the Guardian that she could not find a market for her male calves. “This year we’re shooting the Jersey crosses, because we’ve not got the space or money to keep them. It doesn’t make me feel good.

“We get the knackerman out to do it. I could never do it. I can’t even feed them if I know they are going to be dead in a few days.” She said the issue was still “kept under the carpet” by the wider food and farming industry and that consumer markets needed to be developed and farmers financially supported to rear the calves.

Another farmer told the Guardian: “I shoot black and white bull calves [the Holstein Friesian breed that predominates the dairy sector in the UK], but am still not hardened to like doing it. We have too many calves here. The space available on the farm [an 800-cow dairy herd] is only suitable for a maximum of 80. The less calves I have the better for the overall farm. This is a business and it has to be financially viable to make it worthwhile.”

A joint NGO, retailer, farming and government initiative to promote markets for bull calves, that closed in 2013, estimated more than £100m was being lost from calves killed before realising their economic worth.

The alternatives to early disposal are not simple. Half a million calves used to be exported from dairy farms via ferries to the continent, which has a larger market for veal. But public protests and industry pressure against animals being sent on long journeys in lorries and lower animal welfare standards in other countries has seen that outlet largely disappear. No calves were exported from England last year, although an estimated 5,000 calves did leave from Scotland and a further 20,000 from Northern Ireland.

Attempts to promote a market for high welfare British rosé veal, championed by the likes of Jamie Oliver and Jimmy Doherty, have met with mixed success with margins for farmers tight and consumer interest low. The RSPCA is calling for the food industry to be allowed to rename veal as rosé beef to end consumer misconception of it as a white meat produced from calves kept in crates and fed milk – a system that was banned in the UK in the early 1990s.

Another alternative is to rear the calves for longer and sell them as beef. One of the companies doing that is Buitelaar, set up in 2006 and which collected more than 35,000 calves from dairy farms across the UK last year. It arranges for them to be reared indoors on a mixed diet and then sold after 12-14 months through UK supermarkets, restaurants and fast food chains. But some breeds such as Jersey cows are not seen as suitable for this option.

There has been a steady growth in the use and effectiveness of sexed semen since the early 1990s, accounting for 18% of total semen sales in 2017. It increases costs for farmers but can reduce the proportion of male calves being born to less than 10%.

Supermarkets could play an important role in reforming the situation and providing a market for meat from bull calves. Tesco, Aldi, Iceland, Lidl, the Co-op and Asda do not ban their milk suppliers from shooting bull calves and it is not outlawed under organic standards. But some of the large chains – the Co-op, Morrisons, Sainsburys and Waitrose – have launched schemes, in conjunction with beef companies such as ABP, Buitelaar and Dunbia, to collect calves and ensure they are reared rather than destroyed.

The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) warns that post-Brexit trade deals could make it harder for farmers to find a market for male calves. “A trade deal that allows cheap beef from countries with lower standards of production will most definitely damage many of the positive initiatives that have been developed over recent years to utilise dairy bull calf beef and veal within the UK market,” said NFU dairy advisor Siân Davies.

A small number of dairy farmers are experimenting with trying to make more use of the bull calves. David Finlay, who runs Cream O’Galloway, one of the UK’s largest “ethical” dairy farms in southwest Scotland, keeps his male and female calves with their mothers for the first five months. The male calves are then reared separately before being sold to a veal producer at eight months.

He loses a large proportion of the milk produced by the female cows, but says his use of a dual purpose breeds of cows (good for milk and meat) means he gains a better market price for the animals. “The message coming to farmers from their peers and the industry is still to chase litres at all costs. But if you are chasing milk there will be a cost in terms of bull calves.”

vjeciupx2bpmj5xodhah

Above – Typical US calf rearing system

Click HERE to go Dairy-Free

Order a FREE vegan kit: http://www.peta.org/living/food/free-vegan-starter-kit/

Take PETA’s Cruelty-Free Shopping Guide along with you next time you head to the store! The handy guide will help you find humane products at a glance. Order a FREE copy HERE

Searching for Cruelty-Free Cosmetics, Personal-Care Products, Vegan Products, or more?
Click HERE to search.

Click HERE to find out How to Wear Vegan!

Want to do more than go vegan? Help others to do so! Click below for nominal, or no, fees to vegan literature that you can use to convince others that veganism is the only compassionate route to being an animal friend:

PETA: https://www.petaliterature.com/

Vegan Outreach: https://veganoutreach.org/order-form/

Get your FREE Activist Kit from PETA, including stickers, leaflets, and guide HERE

Have questions? Click HERE

 

Corona virus and conscience virus

According to the UN, around 15,000 children under the age of five die every day.

hungry-children
According to a report by Unicef, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank, 5.6 million children died last year.

These children who die of hunger are practically murdered.

From whom?
From those who finance the dirty business of factory farming, from the Carnivores.  Because the countries of Third World sell their grain harves (500,000 tons per year) to the West, they feed the cattle of the Rich World, while their own children die of hunger in their parents’ arms.

15,000 children die every day. It’s about daily mass murder.
But nobody cares. All follow the media propaganda of the coronavirus!

kind in Jemenpg

The WHO is now calling for an international emergency because of 364 people who died of coronavirus in China!!!

Zitat über Welthunger

The humanity is infested with the conscience – virus, but we have not yet found a remedy.

What a hideous animal is the human being!

My best regards to all, Venus

England: Snapshot – Part 2 To Our Recent Post.

England

 

As we said in our recent post – https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2020/01/31/member-of-the-eu-then-you-have-to-abide-by-these-crazy-regulations-any-wonder-why-brits-want-out-get-real-eu-what-about-important-things/   – ‘Being involved ourselves with live animal transport investigation work for a long time; we have a bit to say about this’.

Hmm; below is a tiny little snapshot of some of the articles we have produced re live animal transport on our WAV and SAV sites over the 30+ years we have been investigating the live animal transport business. As you must be able to tell by now (yes really !); we have no faith in the EU or those involved within EU ‘political elite’ areas it to try and stop live animal transport. We hear now smooth talk of a ‘farm to fork’ strategy only just being recognised by the EU; and we ask ourselves; potential reality or another EU pipe dream ? – pipe dreams look good when they take the form of ‘EU Regulations’; it’s the enforcing of them that is the ‘no go’.

Let us turn to 2 issues that we personally have in depth experience of. Whilst I (Mark) was running SAV in the early days –   https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/ and https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/about-us/ – I was also the EU Correspondent for KAALE- Kent Action Against Live Exports; a Kent group which is now still fighting the live animal trade. We then worked with Kent Trading Standards, an official body, to bring about a (successful) prosecution of Mr Onderwater; a Dutch livestock haulier, who had been illegally shipping British sheep to mainland EU, whilst declaring on the formal export paperwork that they were cartons of ‘boxed meat’ and not actual live animals. At a resulting court trial here at Folkestone Magistrates Court, Kent, England; on 5th July 2010  Mr Onderwater pleaded guilty to no less than 6 offences (under the Animal Health Act) of causing animal suffering of sheep in contravention of the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (England) Order 2006 and EU Council Regulation (EC) 1/2005 (Protection of animals during transport).. He was also fined £10,370 and by being convicted under UK law, effectively became a convicted criminal.

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2019/07/18/the-dutch-convict-who-still-exports-sheep-from-the-uk-to-mainland-europe-and-guess-what-the-eu-does-nothing/

 

More reading on the issue from a Kent newspaper::

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/deal/news/meat-firm-onderwater-agnueax-fin-a83202/

 

It involved a lot of work on our part. We presented all of our evidence relating to the Onderwater offences / prosecutions to both the EU and Dutch authorities; and guess what, the Dutch simply gave him a ‘ticking off’, but allowing him to continue operations in the live animal transport business, whilst the EU simply and totally ignored all of our evidence which simply allowed him to continue with his operations; which he does to this day regardless of his convictions in the UK under a court trial; now shipping live calves and sheep out of (Ramsgate) England to the mainland EU. And the EU thinks it is more important to have legislation about bent bananas that taking action here ! ? !!! – we disagree rather strongly !

For the ‘boxed meat’ shipments, Onderwater was using a ‘sealed type box trailer’ (see photos below), which carried live animals, but from the outside looked like a normal refrigerated trailer. We have always had issues with this type of trailer being used to transport live animals and have been doing running battles with the EU about it for many years !

box 1

ValCameron141113_7598 _2

Both these box trailers are full of live sheep – would you know ?

– where is the signage we ask ?

 

We were always very concerned that despite what the EU Reg 1/2005 says; about clear identification that live animals are being transported; trailers that we witnessed on the road (as shown above); and there were many times; they hardly ever carried any hint of signage to say that live animals were being carried within. We had specific concerns that should the trailer be involved in a road accident; local emergency rescue crews would not open access doors as they had no information written on the trailer that live animals were being carried. As a result; many animals could have suffocated or endured serious injuries without rescue teams having any idea that live beings were inside. In our reports, we even proposed signage which should be fitted to All areas of the trailer – top / underside, both sides, the rear – making it utterly clear to any emergency rescue crews that live animals were on board. This was nothing new, it should have been automatically undertaken to comply with EU Regulation 1/2005 anyway; but as with most, if not all animal welfare transport regulations in the EU, the hauliers largely ignore them; knowing that there is not really anyone around to enforce !

 

Here below is a copy of the label which we suggested to the EU that should be fitted on all panels to all box trailers carrying live animals.  We suggested about A3 size; with colours of back, red and yellow – a yellow background, wording in red and the animal pictures in black.

In this example we did English and German wording; but suggested that maybe 4 ‘prime’ EU languages should be shown on the warning label.  As you can see at the bottom we made it clear to help emergency services – “LIVE ANIMALS – In the event of an emergency; open the trailer doors to provide ventilation immediately”.

The EU never came back to us about this; what, some 10 years ago.  Un identified box trailers are still hauling live animals in un-identified configurations on a daily basis !

 

Box trailer warning label

 

Have a look at some previous posts we have published on this, and the box type sealed trailers:

 

Onderwater

 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2019/07/18/the-dutch-convict-who-still-exports-sheep-from-the-uk-to-mainland-europe-and-guess-what-the-eu-does-nothing/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2019/08/08/england-sealed-box-animal-trailers-how-the-industry-dodges-identifying-what-they-carry-and-the-eu-does-nothing-about-it/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2017/07/21/uk-as-we-said-away-from-the-useless-eu-shackles-the-uk-can-and-will-take-back-control-for-the-better-of-animals-and-the-environment/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2017/08/30/england-live-animal-export-protests-by-dutchman-onderwater-ramsgate-kent-24817/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/09/09/england-big-protest-against-live-exports-as-always-but-lots-of-sailings-by-dutchman-onderwater-for-muslim-eid-festival-in-eu/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2014/10/09/netherlands-uk-footage-of-live-british-sheep-exported-by-dutchman-onderwater-to-mainland-eu/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2019/05/05/the-cruelty-transport-of-unweaned-calves-direct-from-ireland-to-france-and-from-scotland-via-ramsgate-england-for-further-fattening-in-spain/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2018/02/21/live-transport-new-video-one-sav-commentator-expresses-the-views-of-so-many-eu-citizens/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2017/12/03/the-eu-is-failing-millions-of-animals-exported-live-a-guardian-uk-press-investigation/

 

Image result for eu bernard van goethem"

Mr Bernard Van Goethem is an EU official very involved with live animal transport; but in our opinion; he does the animals in transport no favours at all. If you look at the EU (DG SANTE) structure chart for ‘Health and Food Safety’, which includes G” – animal health and WELFARE; there is a so called ‘Crisis Management Team’ which is headed by Mr Van Goethem. Sorry, but we have been pointing out a ‘crisis’ with unidentified animal carrying sealed box trailers to him for probably the last 10 years or more – and like all crisis managers; he has decided to ignore the evidence we give, and remedies to correct we propose. When does a crisis become a real crisis we ask ?

VDG Crisis management EU

 

In our opinion this man represents everything which is so pathetic about the EU – nice job title; well paid, nice office no doubt; nice suit; but utterly ineffective at taking very important animal welfare issues and decisions on board; and even more seriously; doing anything about rectifying them !

Our section leader at G3; Mr Gavinelli; we have found in our correspondence, is much better than his boss; always willing to listen to our case and being very supportive of animal welfare, for which we thank him. Sadly, Van Goethem is at the top; so in compliance with much of the important things at the EU; nothing really ever gets done.

Here are some posts we have published in the past; many from our ‘SAV’ site – including our requests for him to resign; such is our personal experiences of his animal welfare ‘crisis management’.

 

WAV – Mr Van Goethem

 

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2019/09/06/england-wav-now-write-to-europe-regarding-romanian-sheep-and-animal-carrying-box-trailers/

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2018/09/08/eu-how-it-is-enhancing-knowledge-on-animal-welfare-or-is-that-dismissing-eu-meat-mafia-or-what/

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2018/08/24/netherlands-summer-heat-by-margreet-eyes-on-animals-amsterdam/

 

Image result for eu bernard van goethem"

 

SAV – Mr Van Goethem

 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/07/21/mr-van-goethem-and-eu-others-all-talk-and-no-action-a-real-head-in-the-sand-situation/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/06/29/mr-van-goethem-resign-now/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/06/07/eu-must-ensure-animal-welfare-or-mr-van-goethem-will-get-you-and-the-next-joke-is/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/06/06/the-eu-excuses-get-more-pathetic-by-the-day-contact-mr-van-goethem-and-show-your-disgust/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/12/03/romania-take-action-for-romanian-live-exports-a-useless-van-goethem-eu-as-always/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/09/05/nl-the-situation-in-turkey-gets-no-better-in-fact-even-worse-blame-mr-van-goethem-and-his-in-effective-team-at-the-eu/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2016/06/17/uk-map-proves-uk-is-ready-to-wave-eu-goodbye-van-goethem-and-others-have-failed-the-animals/

 

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2017/09/13/uk-campaigners-from-over-25-nations-work-together-today-13917-to-end-live-animal-exports/

https://serbiananimalsvoice.com/2017/07/21/uk-as-we-said-away-from-the-useless-eu-shackles-the-uk-can-and-will-take-back-control-for-the-better-of-animals-and-the-environment/

 

https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2018/09/21/the-eu-and-its-failure-of-animal-welfare-c-o-junker-tusk-vangoethem-etc/

 

So; just a very short snapshot of how to do a lot (from our side); gather information; present the evidence; and then be completely ignored by the EU or anyone who can actually make proper, effective changes.

Do we get angry with this attitude to what we say ? – yes; a bit; but we are kind of used to it after all these years, but on the flip side, it just gives us additional conviction to fight those like both the above, and the animal transport industry in general.

We do this for nobody but the animals who suffer – for them it is an ‘Eternal Treblinka’.

 

EoA June 5

Photo – Eyes on Animals (NL)

 

You can run but you cannot hide !

 

Regards Mark.

 

 

Kanada: Tar sand oil is ecoterrorism and must be stopped

 

kanada-97

Canada faces the largest tar sand mine ever. For them, 292 km² of forest and wetlands would be cleared or polluted. The extraction of oil would destroy the habitat of caribou and bears, and the Wood Buffalo National Park is in danger. Prime Minister Trudeau makes decisions at all times – he must stop the catastrophe now!

-trudeau-teersand-alberta

In parts of Alberta it already looks like Mordor. Open-cast mines are excavated in open-cast mines; previously forest and nature were destroyed. In artificial lakes there is water contaminated with heavy metals. Reservoirs and refineries emit toxic fumes.

The Canadian company Suncor operates a huge process plant for oil from tar sands near Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada. © Todd Korol / Reuters

 

The new project called Frontier Tar Sand Mine is an ecological monster, bigger than all previous ones. It hardly spares an environmental mess. Teck Resources plans to invest 13 billion euros.
From 2026, 260,000 barrels of oil are to be extracted every day – for 40 years!!

 

The oil from tar sand is the most climate-damaging in the world. It is not normal crude oil, but tar sand, also known as oil sand, a mixture of sand, water and heavy crude oil.

Far larger amounts of energy are needed for extraction and processing than for conventional petroleum. To protect the climate, the oil must remain in the ground – the billion-dollar project would make the phasing out of fossil fuels an illusion.

 

Pipelines are under construction to export the viscous oil – they contain ecological explosives. The Trans Mountain Pipeline leads over the Rocky Mountains on British Columbia’s Pacific coast. Leaks are likely, if an oil tanker breaks down, threatens to contaminate the coast and the habitat of rare orcas.

The mine project also alerts Unesco. The guardians of the World Heritage Sites see Wood Buffalo National Park at the mouth of the Athabasca River in danger. The river is already polluted; now his condition could get worse.

After a public hearing, an expert report warned of the environmental consequences. 3,000 hectares of old, original forests and 14,000 hectares of wetlands would be completely destroyed.

The population also suffers from environmental degradation. But the rights of the indigenous people are violated.

 

Canada is planning several large pipelines for the transportation of the crude oil.

The Trans Mountain Expansion Project has already been approved and is supported by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He even bought the pipeline connecting Alberta’s oil fields to the Pacific coast to drive expansion.
However, the provincial government of British Columbia is trying to prevent the construction from being imposed by environmental regulations.

 

The Enbridge Line 3 pipeline has also already been approved. It leads south to the United States. The KeystoneXL pipeline, which also connects Canada’s tar sand fields to the United States, is intended to pump oil to refineries in Texas over a distance of 2,700 kilometers.

The petroleum economy also requires a pipeline to the east – for the export of tar sand oil to Europe. However, the TransCanada group buried its Energy East project on the Atlantic coast at the end of 2017. The company has thus bowed to public pressure.

 

My comment: The Canadian province of Alberta is de facto an oil state: After Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, the world’s third largest crude oil reserves are stored here.

Canada already produces today as much oil as Kuwait. Soon it will be twice as much. And Canada is already the largest crude oil supplier in the USA.

The oil companies get everything they want from politics. The free market and oil income outweigh all other factors.

The oil has to be extracted from the tar sands in an energy-intensive manner and with great interventions in nature. This makes extraction complicated and expensive.

But Canada still thinks the effort is worth it: It is estimated that the government and the provinces will generate revenues of just under $ 80 billion between 2012 and 2035.

What does that have to do with Germany and the EU?
A lot of!
In January 2017, the European Union voted for the trade agreement with Canada and allowed more Canadian oil (tar sands, oil sands) to be imported from Canada.

CETA: Dirty oil has been given a clean label.
Since December 2014, the energy source, which comes mainly from Alberta in Canada, has no longer been classified as environmentally harmful by the European Union.

‘”Why don’t everyone protest today? The potential health effects of ecoterrorism for profit and money are enormous and threaten all of us – from water and soil poisoning to the effects of a warming global climate on public health -The effects will soon be devastating. “

That was what an older protester told me at a demo against Glyphosate years ago.
And he was right.

 

slogan ignoranz pg

My best regards to all, Venus

Kosovo: Dog fighting as an organized crime

 

flagge-kosovo-1400x1000

 

Summary: We request from Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj, AUVK, and Kosovo Police to stop this cruel act once and for ever and to instruct all police forces to take action against the offenders and the abuse of dogs for fights.

Personal story: I am starting this petition to stop the sick blood sport of dog fighting in Kosovo and to close all the dog breeding kennels where dogs are bred especially for dog fights.

Dogfights are taking place every day in Kosovo.

  hundekämpfe Kosovopg11. Mai 2019 — This is done by teenagers!

 

In Rahovec Kosovo just recently in January 2019 two dogs were forced to fight each other until one of the dogs died from bleeding injuries. I have also come across people who have made dog fighting an online business. They breed dogs especially for dogfighting and they advertise them and sell them via Facebook.

The biggest one is in Prizren Kosovo Fighting dogs are kept isolated from other dogs and most people, so they spend most of their lives on short, heavy chains.

hundekampf kososvo jpg

The conditioning of fighting dogs may make use of a variety of legal and illegal drugs, including anabolic steroids to enhance muscle mass and encourage aggressiveness. Narcotic drugs may also be used to increase the dogs’ aggression, increase reactivity and mask pain or fear during a fight. Sparring comes into play:

Sparring consists of using a dog as practice for a fighter dog.

Many of the dogs used in sparring are stolen from dog kennels and shelters or even from the same street.

Fighting dogs may have their ears cropped and tails docked close to their bodies. Fighters usually perform this cropping/docking themselves using crude and inhumane techniques.

kosovo dogfighting pg

Dogs forced into fighting suffer terrible injuries, both from the fights and at the hands of their vicious ‘owners’. Most will ultimately be killed in the ring or die soon after from their injuries. Those who can no longer fight are often brutally dispatched.

kososvo pg

This barbaric practice must be stopped. Those that take place in dog fighting are generally involved in other illegal behaviors.

Dog fighting is barbaric and cannot be allowed to be part of a modern society. Instead of tolerating such cruel acts which have impacts on human minds and their willingness to accept killings of living existences, we demand the Prime Minister to adapt a law for animal protection, putting every cruelty against animals and every offence under severe punishment.

dog-fighting-2

Will you join me today by signin this petition to help bring dog fighters to justice? 

The issue: Dog fighting is barbaric and we cannot allow it to be part of modern society.

Take action! Dogfighting is the worst thing to happen to dogs. It’s brutal. The people who do this are disgusting and should be ashamed of what they’re doing. Dogs are supposed to be loved not killed. I care about all dogs and they deserve to be treated with love and respect.

Please join me by signing my petition so that all dogs in Kosova are treated with love and respect they deserve.

Thank you. A.D.F.C Kosovo Manager

https://www.change.org/p/to-the-prime-minister-of-kosova-ramush-haradinaj-ban-the-cruel-dog-fighting-blood-sport-in-kosovo-and-close-all-the-dog-fighting-breeders

 

My comment: Kosovo is a republic in south-eastern Europe on the western part of the Balkan Peninsula. It was formerly part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and has been a part of the Republic of Serbia since 2003.The Republic of Kosovo is considered a stabilized de facto – regime. On February 17, 2008, the Parliament proclaimed the independence of the territory. The country’s status under international law is controversial, 114 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognize the Republic of Kosovo as independent.

And now I want to further explain the sentence of the article “Those that take place in dog fighting are generally involved in other illegal behaviors”:

-According to the corruption index, Kosovo is at the top with Cambodia and Cameroon, and the mafia washes its dirty money there – all under the eyes of the UN, which wanted to build the mini-state according to its ideas.

-According to the U.S. Department of State, Kosovo and its neighboring regions are one of the most important European drug transit routes for heroin from Afghanistan to Western Europe. In the meantime, up to 80 percent of the heroin smuggled into Western Europe comes from Kosovo.

-In particular, the country’s prime minister, Ramush Haradinaj, has been accused of being linked to the drug trade. Because the governing members of the government generally maintain a closeness to organized crime, mafia-like structures form the basis of the leadership areas in the political landscape.

A high-ranking BND employee spoke of Kosovo as a country in which “organized crime is the form of government” (BND = Bundesnachrichtendienst, one of the three German intelligence agencies).

-Terrible crimes against the civilian population of Kosovo remain unsolved years later. Kidnappings, murders and barbaric removal of organs in the late 1990s and early 2000s to an extent unprecedented for Europe were practically everyday.

-Freedom of the press has even deteriorated in recent years, according to the International Research & Exchanges Board (IREX). This puts Kosovo behind all of its neighboring countries except Albania.

Of course there are dog fights all over the world; in Germany they are forbidden but they still take place illegally here.
I have described the political situation in Kosovo in order to emphasize the courage and strength of animal rights activists if they still want to fight against this mafia under such prevailing conditions.
We will help them and sign the petition, which now has almost 200,000 signatures.

In addition to political measures as well as petitions, demos … the commitment of everyone is important: keep an eye out, it could be a dogfighting cartel in an inner-city warehouse next to your office or on a rural farm in your quiet village.

Show civil courage, keep your eyes and ears open and inform the police or the veterinary office, even if something seems suspicious to you.

The criminals act because the inactive enable them.

https://de.sputniknews.com/politik/20190305324207638-kosovo-organhandel-interview/

https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/kosovo-mafia-staat-von-un-gnaden-3082322.html

My best regards to all, Venus

 

An open letter to the Eurogroup for animals

 

Schweinezucht-Cage -PETA-D

The current Federal Agriculture Minister of Germany, (the worst for animal welfare but the best farmer lobbyist as she only does what they want), Julia Klöckner wants to legalize the too narrow individual cages for sows that have been banned for decades.

A draft regulation by the conservative politician removes the requirement that the animals must be able to stretch their legs.

Schweinezucht-PETA-D

Only after the possible transition period of up to 17 years would the times be reduced for keeping animals in them, and the length of the boxes will increase to 220 cm instead of 200 as they are now!!

Pigs stands with a width of 65 cm (gilts) or 70 cm (sows) and a length of 200 cm are currently common practice, although a fully-grown pig has a body height of 90 cm.

There must be room for the legs to extend full length.

Schweinezucht-PETA-D

But if the farmers had to widen the box stands, it could be expensive.

That is why the Ministry of Agriculture wants to lift the regulation, which is annoying for many animal owners.

After a tough fight by animal rights activists, the decision of the Federal Council has been postponed to February 14, 2020.

Ferkel

In order to influence this decision positively, there is a letter and a petition to the new head of the EU Commission (Eurogroup knows that) and another petition addressed to the Federal Council of Germany.

“Whatever the Federal Council decides on February 14th can no longer be changed by Minister Klöckner”, the petition explains fairly naively, thereby proving that the initiators know neither Klöckner nor the Federal Council.

Klöcknern

The maximum result that could come from the second petition would be that Klöckner shortens the transition period.

Because something else is not to be expected from the Federal Council.

The Federal Council has as Members only conservative factory farming lobbyists, self-operating farm owners, hunting fans and mostly disinterested heads of state.

One of them, the green Prime Minister of Baden-Württemberg Winfried Kretschmann, is ceremoniously received by the hunting association in a castle!!

Back to the 1st comment – Klöcker herself is the WORST for animal welfare and the BEST for the farmers – a real friend of the meat industry.

klöckner mit Kalbjpg

So.. why one petition after another?
Didn’t reach the 1.5 million?
Is that what the initiators of the “end the cage age” campaign actually do?

The animal rights movement has turned into a petition shop.
We feel abandoned and cheated by these initiators.
The crime in Midia remains unpunished to this day, the 1.5 million vision (Ban live exports and break the cage) remains unfulfilled.

schweinekasten Fabrik
With petitions you can of course keep your post and secure your existence.
Nothing else will come of it.
Even if you started a thousand new petitions.

And it is precisely these new petitions against the pig cages that make us feel uneasy.
The fear that Eurogroup knows more than we do and that is a bad thing.
Namely that the EU Commission will again consciously, knowingly, deliberately betray the animals.

And the Eurogroupe can’t help it because it doesn’t decide anything anyway.
It (Eurogroup) can only work with MEP’s, while we know the Commissioners only have the final say, and not the MEP’s or the EU citizens.

Those who can decide for changes to improve welfare don’t want to, and those who want (the EU citizens) can’t.

Klöckner -China-1_cid367Federal Minister of Agriculture Julia Klöckner with her Chinese counterpart Han Changfu after signing the bilateral agreement, source: BMEL

 

In any case, the Agriculture Minister of Germany Julia Klöckner made a decision in advance and acted against the will of 1.5 million citizens with the extension of the pig cages for 17 years! – the advanced decision says little about democracy in what is called a ‘democratic member state of the EU’.

And she does it, even before the EU Commission makes a judgment about the boxes. She is a poodle of the farmers; nothing else. They command and she barks support.

Germany is the most influential country within the European Union and holds the EU Council Presidency from July 2020.

So … if Germany, then the whole of Europe remains in the age of the cage.
The wishes of over 1 million EU citizens has been ignored, as is usually the case.

And by the way, the crimes against animals and the environment go on UNDIMINISHED!

Client: EU Commission and everyone who works for them.

As we always say, the EU is run by lobbyists, not citizens. They get what they want – the common man does not!

Mark Johnson and Venus Reichenbach (WAV)